Clerkship Faculty Perspectives on Basic-Science Integration During Clinical Training: Implications for Fourth-Year Physiology Elective Development

The shortened pre-clerkship phase in integrated medical curricula has raised concerns about whether medical students retain and apply foundational basic-science knowledge during clerkship. Yet few studies incorporate clerkship faculty perspectives, who directly observe students’ mechanistic reasoning and are well-positioned to inform curricular interventions for vertical integration. This mixed-method study addresses that gap by conducting a clerkship faculty-centered needs assessment evaluating basic-science integration, students’ preparedness, and priorities for physiology-focused electives during clerkship. Faculty overwhelmingly affirmed the importance of basic-science integration during clerkship (83%,). However, fewer than half believed the curriculum adequately achieves this. While 71% reported opportunities to assess students’ application of basic-science knowledge during clerkship, only 53% felt students possessed adequate baseline knowledge. These findings suggest that integration on the wards is opportunistic, completely dependent on individual faculty initiative or clinical encounter, rather than deliberate curriculum design. Clerkship faculty identified renal/electrolyte physiology, pharmacology, and neuro-psychiatric physiology as potential high-yield elective topics for the elective course. Additionally, 79% of faculty agreed students would benefit from proposed fourth-year physiology electives, with the course on obesity pathophysiology receiving the highest number of first-choice rankings. Overall, the findings demonstrate a persistent gap in basic-science integration during clerkship and support the development of a clerkship faculty–informed, need-based physiology elective to reinforce mechanistic understanding and enhance receptivity among clinical educators, who cite time constraints and dense curricular expectations as major barriers to basic-science integration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AJP Advances in Physiology Education
Published
2026-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00291.2025
Primary Topic
Educational Leadership and Innovation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clerkship Faculty Perspectives on Basic-Science Integration During Clinical Training: Implications for Fourth-Year Physiology Elective Development

Priya Harindranathan, Shakeel Ahmed, Komal Marwaha, Kathrine Asmis et al.
AJP Advances in Physiology Education
Educational Leadership and Innovation
article

Clerkship Faculty Perspectives on Basic-Science Integration During Clinical Training: Implications for Fourth-Year Physiology Elective Development

Priya Harindranathan, Shakeel Ahmed, Komal Marwaha, Kathrine Asmis, Ryan Cain
article en

Abstract

The shortened pre-clerkship phase in integrated medical curricula has raised concerns about whether medical students retain and apply foundational basic-science knowledge during clerkship. Yet few studies incorporate clerkship faculty perspectives, who directly observe students’ mechanistic reasoning and are well-positioned to inform curricular interventions for vertical integration. This mixed-method study addresses that gap by conducting a clerkship faculty-centered needs assessment evaluating basic-science integration, students’ preparedness, and priorities for physiology-focused electives during clerkship. Faculty overwhelmingly affirmed the importance of basic-science integration during clerkship (83%,). However, fewer than half believed the curriculum adequately achieves this. While 71% reported opportunities to assess students’ application of basic-science knowledge during clerkship, only 53% felt students possessed adequate baseline knowledge. These findings suggest that integration on the wards is opportunistic, completely dependent on individual faculty initiative or clinical encounter, rather than deliberate curriculum design. Clerkship faculty identified renal/electrolyte physiology, pharmacology, and neuro-psychiatric physiology as potential high-yield elective topics for the elective course. Additionally, 79% of faculty agreed students would benefit from proposed fourth-year physiology electives, with the course on obesity pathophysiology receiving the highest number of first-choice rankings. Overall, the findings demonstrate a persistent gap in basic-science integration during clerkship and support the development of a clerkship faculty–informed, need-based physiology elective to reinforce mechanistic understanding and enhance receptivity among clinical educators, who cite time constraints and dense curricular expectations as major barriers to basic-science integration.

AJP Advances in Physiology Education
Texas Tech University (US), Illinois College (US), Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Educational Leadership and Innovation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.