Benchmarking Australian Dental Weighted Activity Units against public and private dental fee schedules: a cross-sectional item-code comparator study

Abstract Objective To benchmark Dental Weighted Activity Units (DWAUs) against Australian dental remuneration schedules and derive suggested recalibration factors for endodontics, periodontics and prosthodontics. Materials and methods A cross-sectional item-code comparator study linked Australian Dental Association item codes to DWAU values and fees from public and private schedules, standardised to 1 January 2025 Australian dollars. The primary outcome was grouped DWAU per dollar, calculated as the sum of DWAUs divided by the sum of fees and expressed as DWAU per $1000. Lower values indicated fewer DWAUs credited per dollar of remuneration. Merged general and merged specialist fee series were constructed, with bootstrap 95% confidence intervals and suggested stream-specific calibration factors estimated. Results Of 343 item codes, 264 had DWAU values greater than zero and 260 were included. Overall DWAU per $1000 was 1.589 for merged general comparators and 1.130 for merged specialist comparators. Under specialist comparators, endodontics had the lowest value at 0.945 DWAU per $1000, 16.40% below the benchmark. The suggested specialist calibration factor for endodontics was 1.196. Discussion The findings indicate that current DWAU values are not uniformly aligned with remuneration signals, particularly for specialist endodontics, and supports stream-specific review rather than a single uniform adjustment. Conclusions Cross-schedule benchmarking and specialist-adjusted DWAU rates may improve public dental activity measurement, commissioning and specialist service planning.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
BDJ Open
Published
2026-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405-026-00479-0
Primary Topic
Dental Health and Care Utilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Benchmarking Australian Dental Weighted Activity Units against public and private dental fee schedules: a cross-sectional item-code comparator study

William Ha, Jonathon Oddy
BDJ Open
Dental Health and Care Utilization
article

Benchmarking Australian Dental Weighted Activity Units against public and private dental fee schedules: a cross-sectional item-code comparator study

William Ha, Jonathon Oddy
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective To benchmark Dental Weighted Activity Units (DWAUs) against Australian dental remuneration schedules and derive suggested recalibration factors for endodontics, periodontics and prosthodontics. Materials and methods A cross-sectional item-code comparator study linked Australian Dental Association item codes to DWAU values and fees from public and private schedules, standardised to 1 January 2025 Australian dollars. The primary outcome was grouped DWAU per dollar, calculated as the sum of DWAUs divided by the sum of fees and expressed as DWAU per $1000. Lower values indicated fewer DWAUs credited per dollar of remuneration. Merged general and merged specialist fee series were constructed, with bootstrap 95% confidence intervals and suggested stream-specific calibration factors estimated. Results Of 343 item codes, 264 had DWAU values greater than zero and 260 were included. Overall DWAU per $1000 was 1.589 for merged general comparators and 1.130 for merged specialist comparators. Under specialist comparators, endodontics had the lowest value at 0.945 DWAU per $1000, 16.40% below the benchmark. The suggested specialist calibration factor for endodontics was 1.196. Discussion The findings indicate that current DWAU values are not uniformly aligned with remuneration signals, particularly for specialist endodontics, and supports stream-specific review rather than a single uniform adjustment. Conclusions Cross-schedule benchmarking and specialist-adjusted DWAU rates may improve public dental activity measurement, commissioning and specialist service planning.

BDJ OpenVol. 12(1)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Dental Health and Care Utilization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.