Prospective multicenter validation of a Urine-Based multiplex assay for risk stratification of patients presenting with gross hematuria.

BACKGROUND: Cystoscopy is the standard-of-care for evaluating patients with gross hematuria (GH), the primary sign of urothelial cancer (UC). To investigate whether Oncuria-Detect can improve detection of UC while evaluating participants with GH. METHODS: From September 2016 through July 2025, 9 academic, private practice, and hospital facilities in the US and Japan prospectively enrolled 450 participants with GH. Prior to the cystoscopic/ureteroscopic evaluation, participants provided a urine sample for Oncuria-Detect and BladderChek™, as well as urine cytology. The diagnostic performance parameters of Oncuria-Detect was compared with BladderChek™ and urine cytology as an aid for detecting de novo UC with cystoscopy/ureteroscopy and histological evaluation. RESULTS: UC was diagnosed in 97 of 450 participants. The Oncuria-Detect assay was positive in 80 of 97 participants with UC resulting in a sensitivity of 82.6% (95%CI, 74.9%-89.6%) and 87.2% negative predictive value (NPV) (95%CI, 83.8%-93.0%). BladderChek™ results were positive in 16 of 97 participants resulting in a sensitivity of 16.4% (95%CI, 10.0%-23.5%) and 80.8% NPV (95%CI, 81.5%-83.8%). Cytology test results were positive in 35 of 97 participants with a sensitivity of 35.7% (95%CI, 26.5%-46.1%) and 84.6% NPV (95%CI, 84.5-88.1). Oncuria-Detect sensitivity remained relatively high all grades and all stages. The number needed to evaluate to detect one UC was 5 for cystoscopy compared to 6 for Oncuria-Monitor, 29 for BladderChek™ and 13 for cytology. CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective trial, Oncuria-Detect demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity for detecting de novo UC than comparator urine tests, supporting its potential as a non-invasive risk stratification tool for patients presenting with GH. FUNDING: This work was supported by NIH/NCI research grants UH3 CA271377 (CJR), R01 CA277810 (HF/CJR), R01 CA198887 (CJR) and U54 CA274375-01 (HF/CJR). CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT03193528.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2026-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djag282
Primary Topic
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prospective multicenter validation of a Urine-Based multiplex assay for risk stratification of patients presenting with gross hematuria.

E Messing, Takuto Shimizu, Garry Peers, Toru Sakatani et al.
PubMed
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
article

Prospective multicenter validation of a Urine-Based multiplex assay for risk stratification of patients presenting with gross hematuria.

E Messing, Takuto Shimizu, Garry Peers, Toru Sakatani, Hideki Furuya, David Josephson, Howard Kim, Sergei Tikhonekov, Ian Pagano, Michael Ahdoot, Menghan Liu, Yingye Zheng, Amit Gupta, Makito Miyake, Satoshi Anai, Zhen Zhang, Yair Lotan, Charles J Rosser, Michael Luu, Arnold I Chin
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cystoscopy is the standard-of-care for evaluating patients with gross hematuria (GH), the primary sign of urothelial cancer (UC). To investigate whether Oncuria-Detect can improve detection of UC while evaluating participants with GH. METHODS: From September 2016 through July 2025, 9 academic, private practice, and hospital facilities in the US and Japan prospectively enrolled 450 participants with GH. Prior to the cystoscopic/ureteroscopic evaluation, participants provided a urine sample for Oncuria-Detect and BladderChek™, as well as urine cytology. The diagnostic performance parameters of Oncuria-Detect was compared with BladderChek™ and urine cytology as an aid for detecting de novo UC with cystoscopy/ureteroscopy and histological evaluation. RESULTS: UC was diagnosed in 97 of 450 participants. The Oncuria-Detect assay was positive in 80 of 97 participants with UC resulting in a sensitivity of 82.6% (95%CI, 74.9%-89.6%) and 87.2% negative predictive value (NPV) (95%CI, 83.8%-93.0%). BladderChek™ results were positive in 16 of 97 participants resulting in a sensitivity of 16.4% (95%CI, 10.0%-23.5%) and 80.8% NPV (95%CI, 81.5%-83.8%). Cytology test results were positive in 35 of 97 participants with a sensitivity of 35.7% (95%CI, 26.5%-46.1%) and 84.6% NPV (95%CI, 84.5-88.1). Oncuria-Detect sensitivity remained relatively high all grades and all stages. The number needed to evaluate to detect one UC was 5 for cystoscopy compared to 6 for Oncuria-Monitor, 29 for BladderChek™ and 13 for cytology. CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective trial, Oncuria-Detect demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity for detecting de novo UC than comparator urine tests, supporting its potential as a non-invasive risk stratification tool for patients presenting with GH. FUNDING: This work was supported by NIH/NCI research grants UH3 CA271377 (CJR), R01 CA277810 (HF/CJR), R01 CA198887 (CJR) and U54 CA274375-01 (HF/CJR). CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT03193528.

PubMed
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US), Hawaii Department of Health (US), University of Hawaii System (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), University of Rochester Medical Center (US), Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US), Tower Urology Medical Group (US), Cancer Center of Hawaii (US), Beverly Hills Cancer Center (US), VA Pacific Islands Health Care System (US), Nonagen Bioscience (United States) (US), Beverly Hills Cardiology (US), University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Nara Medical University (JP), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.