Hospital volume and outcomes after code-defined inpatient ventral hernia repair: A machine-learning analysis of the national inpatient sample, 2016–2022

Abstract Purpose The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) does not capture outpatient hernia surgery or clinical features that define complex incisional hernia. We evaluated the continuous hospital-volume association in an inpatient code-defined abdominal wall repair (CAWR) cohort and assessed its robustness with an instrumental-variable analysis. Methods Adults in the 2016–2022 NIS were included when an ICD-10-CM K43.x ventral-hernia diagnosis occurred with an abdominal-wall mesh or component-separation/transversus abdominis release-adjacent procedure code ( n = 85,426). Double/debiased machine-learning partially linear regression estimated adjusted associations. A leave-one-out Census-division-by-year CAWR-density instrument was used as a sensitivity analysis; its estimate has a local-average-treatment-effect interpretation only if instrumental-variable assumptions hold. The primary outcome combined in-hospital mortality, coded surgical-site infection, and an intensive-care-equivalent severe course; components were also examined separately. Results Per 10 additional annual CAWR cases, the adjusted association was − 0.09% points for the composite outcome (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.19 to 0.01; P = 0.079) and − 0.05% points for mortality (95% CI, -0.09 to -0.01; P = 0.013). Length of stay increased by 0.13 days and charges by approximately 3.1%. In the instrumental-variable analysis, composite and mortality estimates attenuated toward the null, whereas length-of-stay and charge estimates persisted. Component-specific instrumental-variable estimates were heterogeneous. Conclusion Within this partial measure of inpatient hospital volume, higher volume was associated with greater inpatient resource use, whereas the mortality association was not robust to instrumental-variable analysis. NIS data cannot establish total institutional hernia volume, anatomical complexity, or a referral threshold.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery
Published
2026-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-026-04177-1
Primary Topic
Hernia repair and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hospital volume and outcomes after code-defined inpatient ventral hernia repair: A machine-learning analysis of the national inpatient sample, 2016–2022

Ahmed M. Omran, Abdelnaser Hamdi Mohammed, Sherif Hamdeno, Mohamed M. Elghor et al.
Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery
Hernia repair and management
article

Hospital volume and outcomes after code-defined inpatient ventral hernia repair: A machine-learning analysis of the national inpatient sample, 2016–2022

Ahmed M. Omran, Abdelnaser Hamdi Mohammed, Sherif Hamdeno, Mohamed M. Elghor, Hamzah M. Alghzawi, Mohamed Gaafar, Mohamed Rifai, Atef A. Hassan, Tarek Zayid
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) does not capture outpatient hernia surgery or clinical features that define complex incisional hernia. We evaluated the continuous hospital-volume association in an inpatient code-defined abdominal wall repair (CAWR) cohort and assessed its robustness with an instrumental-variable analysis. Methods Adults in the 2016–2022 NIS were included when an ICD-10-CM K43.x ventral-hernia diagnosis occurred with an abdominal-wall mesh or component-separation/transversus abdominis release-adjacent procedure code ( n = 85,426). Double/debiased machine-learning partially linear regression estimated adjusted associations. A leave-one-out Census-division-by-year CAWR-density instrument was used as a sensitivity analysis; its estimate has a local-average-treatment-effect interpretation only if instrumental-variable assumptions hold. The primary outcome combined in-hospital mortality, coded surgical-site infection, and an intensive-care-equivalent severe course; components were also examined separately. Results Per 10 additional annual CAWR cases, the adjusted association was − 0.09% points for the composite outcome (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.19 to 0.01; P = 0.079) and − 0.05% points for mortality (95% CI, -0.09 to -0.01; P = 0.013). Length of stay increased by 0.13 days and charges by approximately 3.1%. In the instrumental-variable analysis, composite and mortality estimates attenuated toward the null, whereas length-of-stay and charge estimates persisted. Component-specific instrumental-variable estimates were heterogeneous. Conclusion Within this partial measure of inpatient hospital volume, higher volume was associated with greater inpatient resource use, whereas the mortality association was not robust to instrumental-variable analysis. NIS data cannot establish total institutional hernia volume, anatomical complexity, or a referral threshold.

Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery
Al-Azhar University (EG), Menoufia University Hospitals (EG), Menoufia University (EG), Tennessee State University (US), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Hernia repair and management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.