What it takes to use AI for social good: evidence from European social good projects and implications for higher education

Abstract This study provides an innovative approach to identify the relevant competence profiles that data science education should promote for work in the social domain. We assess the supply side of European Data Science for Good (DSG) initiatives and analyse 335 projects. Based on project documentation, we identify 146 distinct data science methods and develop a taxonomy that distinguishes between statistical and machine learning approaches and classifies methods according to the scale of the target variables (nominal, ordinal, metric). The results show a strong dominance of machine learning, particularly in classification-oriented problem settings, alongside a substantial role for exploratory and descriptive analysis in evaluation tasks. Drawing on these patterns, we provide a discussion on the implications for curriculum design of higher education programmes in social data science and artificial intelligence, arguing for an educational profile that aligns advanced methodological skills in machine learning with solid statistical literacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EPJ Data Science
Published
2026-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-026-00691-w
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What it takes to use AI for social good: evidence from European social good projects and implications for higher education

Theo Berger, Hannes Scheffter
EPJ Data Science
Online Learning and Analytics
article

What it takes to use AI for social good: evidence from European social good projects and implications for higher education

Theo Berger, Hannes Scheffter
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study provides an innovative approach to identify the relevant competence profiles that data science education should promote for work in the social domain. We assess the supply side of European Data Science for Good (DSG) initiatives and analyse 335 projects. Based on project documentation, we identify 146 distinct data science methods and develop a taxonomy that distinguishes between statistical and machine learning approaches and classifies methods according to the scale of the target variables (nominal, ordinal, metric). The results show a strong dominance of machine learning, particularly in classification-oriented problem settings, alongside a substantial role for exploratory and descriptive analysis in evaluation tasks. Drawing on these patterns, we provide a discussion on the implications for curriculum design of higher education programmes in social data science and artificial intelligence, arguing for an educational profile that aligns advanced methodological skills in machine learning with solid statistical literacy.

EPJ Data ScienceVol. 15(1)
University of Bremen (DE), Hannover Re (Germany) (DE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Online Learning and Analytics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

What it takes to use AI for social good: evidence from European social good projects and implications for higher education — Theo Berger, Hannes Scheffter · EPJ Data Science (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS