Operationalizing the Patch Concept in Foraging Ecology: A Systematic Review of 133 Species Across EUNIS Habitat Types

Understanding how animals operationally identify and exploit resource patches is central to foraging ecology. The “patch”—a discrete area of resource concentration—is the fundamental unit of individual foraging behavior; however, standardized operational definitions of the criteria for patch identification across taxa, habitats, and biomes are still scarce. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we reviewed 87 empirical studies encompassing 133 species, classifying patch identification methods across eight macro-categories of the European Nature Information System (EUNIS)—a structurally detailed habitat classification that, despite its European origin, we apply here as a general structural template for habitat architecture rather than as a claim of biogeographic universality, given that our dataset also spans non-European taxa and biomes. Patches are operationally identified through two approaches: observational delineation of natural resource structures (e.g., fruiting trees, prey aggregations, vegetation clusters) and experimental manipulation via artificial depletable units. We demonstrate that habitat structural complexity and species trophic preferences jointly govern the operational method by which patches are identified: habitat architecture determines which operational approach is used for patch delineation—observational or experimental—while a four-category Feeding Guild classification (Granivore, Herbivore, Omnivore, Carnivore) reveals that resource discretizability—the capacity to standardize prey into countable, depletable units—operates as the primary species-level predictor of patch identification method selection, an association that remains robust after formally controlling for phylogenetic non-independence and body mass in a mixed-effects model. The resulting framework provides, for the first time, a standardized operational guide for calibrating patch identification methods to habitat type and species trophic preferences and searching behavior across taxa and biomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environments
Published
2026-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/environments13080458
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Operationalizing the Patch Concept in Foraging Ecology: A Systematic Review of 133 Species Across EUNIS Habitat Types

Alberto Basset, Marco Elia
Environments
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
article

Operationalizing the Patch Concept in Foraging Ecology: A Systematic Review of 133 Species Across EUNIS Habitat Types

Alberto Basset, Marco Elia
article en

Abstract

Understanding how animals operationally identify and exploit resource patches is central to foraging ecology. The “patch”—a discrete area of resource concentration—is the fundamental unit of individual foraging behavior; however, standardized operational definitions of the criteria for patch identification across taxa, habitats, and biomes are still scarce. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we reviewed 87 empirical studies encompassing 133 species, classifying patch identification methods across eight macro-categories of the European Nature Information System (EUNIS)—a structurally detailed habitat classification that, despite its European origin, we apply here as a general structural template for habitat architecture rather than as a claim of biogeographic universality, given that our dataset also spans non-European taxa and biomes. Patches are operationally identified through two approaches: observational delineation of natural resource structures (e.g., fruiting trees, prey aggregations, vegetation clusters) and experimental manipulation via artificial depletable units. We demonstrate that habitat structural complexity and species trophic preferences jointly govern the operational method by which patches are identified: habitat architecture determines which operational approach is used for patch delineation—observational or experimental—while a four-category Feeding Guild classification (Granivore, Herbivore, Omnivore, Carnivore) reveals that resource discretizability—the capacity to standardize prey into countable, depletable units—operates as the primary species-level predictor of patch identification method selection, an association that remains robust after formally controlling for phylogenetic non-independence and body mass in a mixed-effects model. The resulting framework provides, for the first time, a standardized operational guide for calibrating patch identification methods to habitat type and species trophic preferences and searching behavior across taxa and biomes.

EnvironmentsVol. 13(8)
University of Salento (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Operationalizing the Patch Concept in Foraging Ecology: A Systematic Review of 133 Species Across EUNIS Habitat Types — Alberto Basset, Marco Elia · Environments (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS