School leadership and artificial intelligence: A framework for critical and reflexive engagement and enactment

Recent advances in digital technologies and generative artificial intelligence are creating significant challenges for education systems and school leaders around the world. Research into these issues has typically involved understanding the opportunities GenAI offers education and considers the potential risks and challenges it poses for school leadership. In this article, we draw on the work of Michel Foucault to construct a framework for ‘AI in school leadership and policy enactment’ (AISLPE) as a reflexive tool for further professional development and training. In doing so, we recognise the importance of problematisation, scepticism, critique and reflexivity through the four main themes of school leadership practices, policy provision, teaching and learning matters and ethical considerations. The importance and contribution of this approach and framework lies in enabling support for school leaders as they tackle these issues in ways that are critically reflective and accommodating for the specific needs of their own contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Management in Education
Published
2026-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08920206261475462
Primary Topic
Global Educational Policies and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

School leadership and artificial intelligence: A framework for critical and reflexive engagement and enactment

Denise Mifsud, Paul Campbell, Richard Niesche
Management in Education
Global Educational Policies and Reforms
article

School leadership and artificial intelligence: A framework for critical and reflexive engagement and enactment

Denise Mifsud, Paul Campbell, Richard Niesche
article en

Abstract

Recent advances in digital technologies and generative artificial intelligence are creating significant challenges for education systems and school leaders around the world. Research into these issues has typically involved understanding the opportunities GenAI offers education and considers the potential risks and challenges it poses for school leadership. In this article, we draw on the work of Michel Foucault to construct a framework for ‘AI in school leadership and policy enactment’ (AISLPE) as a reflexive tool for further professional development and training. In doing so, we recognise the importance of problematisation, scepticism, critique and reflexivity through the four main themes of school leadership practices, policy provision, teaching and learning matters and ethical considerations. The importance and contribution of this approach and framework lies in enabling support for school leaders as they tackle these issues in ways that are critically reflective and accommodating for the specific needs of their own contexts.

Management in Education
UNSW Sydney (AU), University of Bath (GB), University of Hong Kong (HK)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Global Educational Policies and Reforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.