Carbonation of alkali-activated materials: A review of mechanisms, testing methods, and research gaps

Alkali-activated materials (AAMs) have attracted considerable attention as low-carbon alternatives to ordinary Portland cement (OPC) due to their resource utilisation potential, excellent mechanical properties, and durability. However, carbonation remains a critical factor affecting their long-term performance. Compared with OPC, carbonation in AAMs involves more complex physicochemical processes owing to differences in pore solution chemistry, gel composition, and calcium content. In addition, significant uncertainties remain regarding the applicability of accelerated carbonation testing and the relationship between accelerated and natural carbonation behaviour. This review provides a comprehensive assessment of the carbonation behaviour of AAMs. A bibliometric analysis is first conducted to identify major research trends over the past decade. Subsequently, carbonation mechanisms, testing methodologies, and key influencing factors are critically reviewed. Attention is given to the effects of environmental conditions, including CO 2 concentration, relative humidity, temperature, and pre-curing regimes, as well as mix design parameters such as precursors, activators, aggregates, and additives. The differences between accelerated and natural carbonation are also systematically discussed. Based on the available evidence, an integrated mechanistic framework linking CO 2 transport, pore solution reactions, gel evolution, pore structure development, and performance changes is proposed. The review highlights that carbonation resistance is governed by the coupled effects of chemical buffering capacity and transport properties, while the discrepancy between accelerated and natural carbonation arises from the interaction of transport, reaction, and microstructural evolution processes. Finally, current research gaps and future directions for carbonation testing standardisation, predictive modelling, and durability assessment are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Next Materials
Published
2026-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nxmate.2026.103197
Primary Topic
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Carbonation of alkali-activated materials: A review of mechanisms, testing methods, and research gaps

Dominic Ek Leong Ong, Warit Wipulanusat, Jeung‐Hwan Doh, Z.H. Ren et al.
Next Materials
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
article

Carbonation of alkali-activated materials: A review of mechanisms, testing methods, and research gaps

Dominic Ek Leong Ong, Warit Wipulanusat, Jeung‐Hwan Doh, Z.H. Ren, Jiarui Liu, Tianyu Sun
article en

Abstract

Alkali-activated materials (AAMs) have attracted considerable attention as low-carbon alternatives to ordinary Portland cement (OPC) due to their resource utilisation potential, excellent mechanical properties, and durability. However, carbonation remains a critical factor affecting their long-term performance. Compared with OPC, carbonation in AAMs involves more complex physicochemical processes owing to differences in pore solution chemistry, gel composition, and calcium content. In addition, significant uncertainties remain regarding the applicability of accelerated carbonation testing and the relationship between accelerated and natural carbonation behaviour. This review provides a comprehensive assessment of the carbonation behaviour of AAMs. A bibliometric analysis is first conducted to identify major research trends over the past decade. Subsequently, carbonation mechanisms, testing methodologies, and key influencing factors are critically reviewed. Attention is given to the effects of environmental conditions, including CO 2 concentration, relative humidity, temperature, and pre-curing regimes, as well as mix design parameters such as precursors, activators, aggregates, and additives. The differences between accelerated and natural carbonation are also systematically discussed. Based on the available evidence, an integrated mechanistic framework linking CO 2 transport, pore solution reactions, gel evolution, pore structure development, and performance changes is proposed. The review highlights that carbonation resistance is governed by the coupled effects of chemical buffering capacity and transport properties, while the discrepancy between accelerated and natural carbonation arises from the interaction of transport, reaction, and microstructural evolution processes. Finally, current research gaps and future directions for carbonation testing standardisation, predictive modelling, and durability assessment are discussed.

Next MaterialsVol. 13
Thammasat University (TH), Griffith University (AU), University of South Australia (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.