Beyond the Methodological Fix: Militant Research, Academic Capture and the Politics of Irresolution in Crisis Borderlands

ABSTRACT This paper examines scholar‐activist methodologies in spaces saturated by humanitarian, media and academic attention to migrant mobility. Drawing on research on the Greek migration regime, it demonstrates how commitments to ‘giving voice’, ‘democratising knowledge’ and ‘reflexivity’ can reproduce the very power asymmetries they claim to contest, particularly in ‘crisis’ settings. Engaging traditions of militant research, feminist discomfort, refusal and studying up, I argue that oppositional methods are routinely captured by the political economy of academia in ways that methodological innovation alone cannot resolve. Rather than proposing another methodological fix, the paper advances a politics of irresolution —an orientation that inhabits contradiction without resolving it into methodological closure, ethical tranquillity or political self‐assurance. Instead of seeking seamless fusion between political organising and research, I explore how their strategic differentiation, what I call militant splitting , may at times be necessary to sustain contradiction without collapsing into performative coherence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Antipode
Published
2026-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.70193
Primary Topic
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond the Methodological Fix: Militant Research, Academic Capture and the Politics of Irresolution in Crisis Borderlands

Danai Avgeri
Antipode
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
article

Beyond the Methodological Fix: Militant Research, Academic Capture and the Politics of Irresolution in Crisis Borderlands

Danai Avgeri
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper examines scholar‐activist methodologies in spaces saturated by humanitarian, media and academic attention to migrant mobility. Drawing on research on the Greek migration regime, it demonstrates how commitments to ‘giving voice’, ‘democratising knowledge’ and ‘reflexivity’ can reproduce the very power asymmetries they claim to contest, particularly in ‘crisis’ settings. Engaging traditions of militant research, feminist discomfort, refusal and studying up, I argue that oppositional methods are routinely captured by the political economy of academia in ways that methodological innovation alone cannot resolve. Rather than proposing another methodological fix, the paper advances a politics of irresolution —an orientation that inhabits contradiction without resolving it into methodological closure, ethical tranquillity or political self‐assurance. Instead of seeking seamless fusion between political organising and research, I explore how their strategic differentiation, what I call militant splitting , may at times be necessary to sustain contradiction without collapsing into performative coherence.

AntipodeVol. 58(5)
University of St Andrews (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Beyond the Methodological Fix: Militant Research, Academic Capture and the Politics of Irresolution in Crisis Borderlands — Danai Avgeri · Antipode (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS