Taxing polluting resources: growth, welfare and consumption inequality

Abstract This paper develops a Romer (1990)‐type endogenous growth model that incorporates polluting non‐renewable resources and heterogeneous households with varying asset holdings. It contributes to the literature on the taxation of polluting exhaustible resources by examining its impact on consumption inequality, with particular emphasis on the role of natural resources as household assets. In the model, the stock of pollution—accumulating through resource use—affects social welfare. We show that, when distortions from intertemporal knowledge spillovers are not fully corrected, environmental tax policies that slow resource extraction and mitigate the welfare costs of pollution can foster economic growth but exacerbate consumption inequality. To promote growth and reduce the welfare damage caused by pollution without increasing inequality, environmental tax revenues should be allocated for redistributive purposes. Lastly, the paper calibrates the model for quantitative analysis and explores environmental tax policies that maximize social welfare under limited government capacity to correct knowledge spillover distortions, relying on environmental tax revenues for redistribution.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique
Published
2026-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/caje.70084
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Taxing polluting resources: growth, welfare and consumption inequality

Ken Tabata
Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique
Climate Change Policy and Economics
article

Taxing polluting resources: growth, welfare and consumption inequality

Ken Tabata
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper develops a Romer (1990)‐type endogenous growth model that incorporates polluting non‐renewable resources and heterogeneous households with varying asset holdings. It contributes to the literature on the taxation of polluting exhaustible resources by examining its impact on consumption inequality, with particular emphasis on the role of natural resources as household assets. In the model, the stock of pollution—accumulating through resource use—affects social welfare. We show that, when distortions from intertemporal knowledge spillovers are not fully corrected, environmental tax policies that slow resource extraction and mitigate the welfare costs of pollution can foster economic growth but exacerbate consumption inequality. To promote growth and reduce the welfare damage caused by pollution without increasing inequality, environmental tax revenues should be allocated for redistributive purposes. Lastly, the paper calibrates the model for quantitative analysis and explores environmental tax policies that maximize social welfare under limited government capacity to correct knowledge spillover distortions, relying on environmental tax revenues for redistribution.

Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.