Labia Minora, Labia Majora, and Clitoral Hood Alteration: Experience-Based Recommendations-A 10-Year Follow-up Report.

This article reports an experience-based 10-year follow-up of a January 2016 Aesthetic Surgery Journal paper that reviewed over 600 cases of labiaplasty and clitoral hood alteration. Long-term follow-up reports of published articles have been recommended to evaluate the original paper's results and conclusions. This is a summary of the author's subsequent labiaplasty experience, evaluating his original technical suggestions and caveats for their validity after performing an additional 800 female external genital aesthetic surgical procedures. The more recent experience of the author indicates that the findings and suggestions in his 2016 article remain valid. Level of Evidence: 5 (Therapeutic) For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2026-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjag147
Primary Topic
Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Labia Minora, Labia Majora, and Clitoral Hood Alteration: Experience-Based Recommendations-A 10-Year Follow-up Report.

John G. Hunter
PubMed
Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues
article

Labia Minora, Labia Majora, and Clitoral Hood Alteration: Experience-Based Recommendations-A 10-Year Follow-up Report.

John G. Hunter
article en

Abstract

This article reports an experience-based 10-year follow-up of a January 2016 Aesthetic Surgery Journal paper that reviewed over 600 cases of labiaplasty and clitoral hood alteration. Long-term follow-up reports of published articles have been recommended to evaluate the original paper's results and conclusions. This is a summary of the author's subsequent labiaplasty experience, evaluating his original technical suggestions and caveats for their validity after performing an additional 800 female external genital aesthetic surgical procedures. The more recent experience of the author indicates that the findings and suggestions in his 2016 article remain valid. Level of Evidence: 5 (Therapeutic) For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

PubMedVol. 46(9)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.