Acceptance of the nonavalent HPV vaccine among medical students: A knowledge, attitudes and practices study

Objectives: Various strains of human papillomavirus (HPV) cause myriad cancers, and previous vaccines protected against the most common oncogenic ones. To increase the protective spectrum, the novel nonavalent vaccine has been introduced. Medical students are future physicians and potential key proponents of this vaccine; hence, awareness among them regarding this vaccine should boost its future adoption. Material and Methods: We assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) among medical students at a single college regarding the nonavalent HPV vaccine and specific reasons against its adoption. All willing medical students were administered a semi-objective questionnaire in English twice; once before a 20-minute visual training presentation on HPV vaccination and once after. The questionnaire contained 9 objective dichotomous questions and 5 questions pertaining to KAP. Training was imparted to batches of 15-20 students at a time. Results: There were 320 participants with a mean (SD) age of 20.39 (1.648) years, with 200 (62.5)% of them being females. Mean (SD) objective scores pre and post training were 4.47 (1.5) and 6.78 (1.308), respectively, showing significant improvement post training (p = 0.001). Second-year students improved significantly more compared to other years (p = 0.01). Knowledge regarding the vaccine significantly improved post-training according to the subjective dichotomous questions(p = 0.001); with 281 (87.8%) participants recommending the vaccine post-training compared to 215 (67.2%) pre-training (p = 0.001). Potential side effects of the nonavalent vaccine were the most common reason for not recommending the vaccine, which was almost completely addressed post-training, whereas the higher cost of the vaccine became the most prevalent reason. Conclusion: In conclusion, focused training improves the KAP of medical students and should enhance future widespread adoption of the nonavalent HPV vaccine.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
South Asian Journal of Cancer
Published
2026-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25259/sajc_33_2025
Primary Topic
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Acceptance of the nonavalent HPV vaccine among medical students: A knowledge, attitudes and practices study

Akshay Ganeshkumar, S. Girish, Ananya Girish
South Asian Journal of Cancer
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
article

Acceptance of the nonavalent HPV vaccine among medical students: A knowledge, attitudes and practices study

Akshay Ganeshkumar, S. Girish, Ananya Girish
article en

Abstract

Objectives: Various strains of human papillomavirus (HPV) cause myriad cancers, and previous vaccines protected against the most common oncogenic ones. To increase the protective spectrum, the novel nonavalent vaccine has been introduced. Medical students are future physicians and potential key proponents of this vaccine; hence, awareness among them regarding this vaccine should boost its future adoption. Material and Methods: We assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) among medical students at a single college regarding the nonavalent HPV vaccine and specific reasons against its adoption. All willing medical students were administered a semi-objective questionnaire in English twice; once before a 20-minute visual training presentation on HPV vaccination and once after. The questionnaire contained 9 objective dichotomous questions and 5 questions pertaining to KAP. Training was imparted to batches of 15-20 students at a time. Results: There were 320 participants with a mean (SD) age of 20.39 (1.648) years, with 200 (62.5)% of them being females. Mean (SD) objective scores pre and post training were 4.47 (1.5) and 6.78 (1.308), respectively, showing significant improvement post training (p = 0.001). Second-year students improved significantly more compared to other years (p = 0.01). Knowledge regarding the vaccine significantly improved post-training according to the subjective dichotomous questions(p = 0.001); with 281 (87.8%) participants recommending the vaccine post-training compared to 215 (67.2%) pre-training (p = 0.001). Potential side effects of the nonavalent vaccine were the most common reason for not recommending the vaccine, which was almost completely addressed post-training, whereas the higher cost of the vaccine became the most prevalent reason. Conclusion: In conclusion, focused training improves the KAP of medical students and should enhance future widespread adoption of the nonavalent HPV vaccine.

South Asian Journal of CancerVol. 0
Vinayaka Missions University (IN), Bangalore Diabetes Centre (IN), All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.