Patterns of negative trauma laparotomy worldwide: a sub-analysis of a global dataset

Abstract Purpose Trauma remains a major contributor to global disability. While the trauma laparotomy can be a life-saving procedure in abdominal injury, a select proportion are performed with no pathology identified intra-operatively, potentially exposing patients to unnecessary morbidity. We aimed to assess the global prevalence of negative laparotomy and identify any influencing factors at both the patient- and system-level. Methods This was a secondary analysis of the GOAL-Trauma study, a multicentre prospective international observational study on trauma laparotomy patients, conducted from April to December 2024. We defined a negative laparotomy as where no intra-abdominal injuries were identified during the index operation. A multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify predictive factors for a negative laparotomy. Results Of the 1769 patients included, 128 patients (7.2%) underwent a negative laparotomy. Regression analysis demonstrated that a penetrating mechanism of injury (OR 2.37, CI:1.53–3.69, p < 0.001) and a lower grade of surgeon (surgical registrar relative to consultant - OR 2.91, CI:1.90–4.47, p < 0.001) were independent predictors for negative laparotomy. Neither human development index nor hospital resource level impacted negative laparotomy rates. Conclusion One in every fourteen trauma laparotomies performed in our global cohort was negative, with injury type and surgeon experience having a significant deterministic role. As trauma systems develop globally, recognition in the value of both training and a structured assessment pathway is paramount. The rate of negative trauma laparotomy, either institutionally or regionally, may act as a useful benchmark of trauma system performance and warrants further exploration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery
Published
2026-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-026-03289-z
Primary Topic
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patterns of negative trauma laparotomy worldwide: a sub-analysis of a global dataset

E. Wong, Joachim K. A. Amoako, Carlos M. Nuño-Guzman, Zane Perkins et al.
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
article

Patterns of negative trauma laparotomy worldwide: a sub-analysis of a global dataset

E. Wong, Joachim K. A. Amoako, Carlos M. Nuño-Guzman, Zane Perkins, Michael Bath, Timothy Craig Hardcastle, LF Reyes, J. Wang, Tom Bashford, Thomas G. Weiser, Jared Wohlgemut, JM Wohlgemut, MM ElSayed, Laura Hobbs, TC Hardcastle, B.G. Smith, A. Tidjane, R.J. Davies, A. Dogjani, A. Elkhouly, M. Zhou, K. Xie, G.A. Bass, S. Gudugbe, A. Meselhi, B. Cissa Wa Numbe, M. Marsden, M. Senbu, Brandon G. Smith, T.G. Weiser, S. Abdelmohsen, H. Taher, M.F. Bath, A. Kwizera, X. Guo, A. Conway Morris, K. Lakhoo, R. Filho, O. Mantle, C.M. Nuño-Guzmán, P. Hutchinson, D.U. Baderhabusha, M. Merene, C. O'Flynn, A. Leather, L. Pino, S.E. Vélez, A. Elmorshdy, M. Khajanchi, C. Hammer, M. Fang, G. Abouelnagah, J. Erhabor, Y.R.A. Nordín Servín, F. Haider, T. Edmiston, N. Bayleyegn, W. Shenkutie, A. Litvin, A. Mazzoleni, T. Tientcheu, F.F.I. Fareed, J. Amoako, T. Bashford, L. Hobbs, K. Kohler, Z.B. Perkins, M. Ahmed, R. Thavayogan, R. Moonesinghe, E. Caceres, R. Naidoo, R. Davenport, Monty Khajanchi, R. Wang, Z. Perkins, S. Liu, Y. Ke, Z. Zhang, W. L. A. Laird, William L. A. Laird, J. Wohlgemut, D. Clarke, G. Osman, Q. Luo, on behalf of the GOAL-Trauma Collaborative, Z. Tian, Z. Wang, Y. Ni, H. Ni, J. Lopez
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Trauma remains a major contributor to global disability. While the trauma laparotomy can be a life-saving procedure in abdominal injury, a select proportion are performed with no pathology identified intra-operatively, potentially exposing patients to unnecessary morbidity. We aimed to assess the global prevalence of negative laparotomy and identify any influencing factors at both the patient- and system-level. Methods This was a secondary analysis of the GOAL-Trauma study, a multicentre prospective international observational study on trauma laparotomy patients, conducted from April to December 2024. We defined a negative laparotomy as where no intra-abdominal injuries were identified during the index operation. A multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify predictive factors for a negative laparotomy. Results Of the 1769 patients included, 128 patients (7.2%) underwent a negative laparotomy. Regression analysis demonstrated that a penetrating mechanism of injury (OR 2.37, CI:1.53–3.69, p < 0.001) and a lower grade of surgeon (surgical registrar relative to consultant - OR 2.91, CI:1.90–4.47, p < 0.001) were independent predictors for negative laparotomy. Neither human development index nor hospital resource level impacted negative laparotomy rates. Conclusion One in every fourteen trauma laparotomies performed in our global cohort was negative, with injury type and surgeon experience having a significant deterministic role. As trauma systems develop globally, recognition in the value of both training and a structured assessment pathway is paramount. The rate of negative trauma laparotomy, either institutionally or regionally, may act as a useful benchmark of trauma system performance and warrants further exploration.

European Journal of Trauma and Emergency SurgeryVol. 52(1)
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University of Ghana (GH), Queen Mary University of London (GB), Universidad de Guadalajara (MX), King Edward Memorial Hospital and Seth G.S. Medical College (IN), Barts Health NHS Trust (GB), University of Cambridge (GB), Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham (GB), Royal London Hospital (GB), Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Korle Bu Teaching Hospital (GH), National Institute for Health and Care Research (GB), Hospital Civil de Guadalajara (MX), East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust (GB), University of Birmingham (GB), University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.