Making hidden biases visible in population location data from mobile phones

Abstract Traditional sources of population data, such as censuses and surveys, are costly, infrequent and often unavailable in crisis-affected regions. Mobile phone data (MPD) offer near-real-time, high-resolution insights into population distribution, but their utility is undermined by unequal access to digital technologies, creating biases that threaten representativeness. Despite recognition of these issues, no standard framework exists to address such biases. We develop and implement a systematic, replicable framework to quantify and explain population coverage bias in aggregated MPD without requiring individual-level attributes. The approach combines an indicator of population coverage bias with explainable machine learning to identify contextual drivers of spatial variation in bias. Using four datasets for the UK benchmarked against the 2021 census, we show that MPD achieve higher population coverage than national surveys, but biases persist across sources and subnational areas. Population coverage bias is associated with demographic, socio-economic and geographic features, often in complex nonlinear ways. Contrary to common assumptions, multi-application datasets do not necessarily reduce bias compared to single-app sources. By providing a transferable framework for measuring and explaining population coverage bias, our study advances the methodological infrastructure required to evaluate, compare and responsibly integrate MPD into population research, official statistics and evidence-based policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Royal Society Open Science
Published
2026-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.251703
Primary Topic
Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Making hidden biases visible in population location data from mobile phones

Francisco Rowe, Carmen Cabrera-Arnau
Royal Society Open Science
Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
article

Making hidden biases visible in population location data from mobile phones

Francisco Rowe, Carmen Cabrera-Arnau
article en

Abstract

Abstract Traditional sources of population data, such as censuses and surveys, are costly, infrequent and often unavailable in crisis-affected regions. Mobile phone data (MPD) offer near-real-time, high-resolution insights into population distribution, but their utility is undermined by unequal access to digital technologies, creating biases that threaten representativeness. Despite recognition of these issues, no standard framework exists to address such biases. We develop and implement a systematic, replicable framework to quantify and explain population coverage bias in aggregated MPD without requiring individual-level attributes. The approach combines an indicator of population coverage bias with explainable machine learning to identify contextual drivers of spatial variation in bias. Using four datasets for the UK benchmarked against the 2021 census, we show that MPD achieve higher population coverage than national surveys, but biases persist across sources and subnational areas. Population coverage bias is associated with demographic, socio-economic and geographic features, often in complex nonlinear ways. Contrary to common assumptions, multi-application datasets do not necessarily reduce bias compared to single-app sources. By providing a transferable framework for measuring and explaining population coverage bias, our study advances the methodological infrastructure required to evaluate, compare and responsibly integrate MPD into population research, official statistics and evidence-based policy.

Royal Society Open ScienceVol. 13(8)
University of Liverpool (GB)
Economic and Social Research Council
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.