Nutritional risk management for stroke survivors with dysphagia in a rehabilitation department: a best practice implementation project

ABSTRACT Introduction: Stroke survivors with dysphagia face a greater risk of malnutrition and life-threatening complications, yet evidence-based nutritional management in this population remains underutilized in clinical practice. Objective: This project aimed to implement and evaluate an evidence-based standardized nutritional risk management program for stroke survivors with dysphagia in a rehabilitation department in a hospital in China. Methods: This evidence implementation project was conducted using the JBI Evidence Implementation Framework, which is grounded in an audit and feedback process, along with a structured approach to identifying barriers to best practice recommendations. The audits included 28 health care professionals. Patient participation was 41 at baseline, 45 at first follow-up, and 46 at second follow-up. Compliance with 27 evidence-based audit criteria was evaluated, and four key barriers were identified, with corresponding change strategies implemented to address them. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, ANOVA, and χ 2 tests. Results: The majority of audit criteria showed significant improvement in compliance: 13 reached 100%, while the remaining 14 achieved a compliance rate exceeding 84%. Health care professionals’ knowledge scores of nutritional management demonstrated a significant increase across the three audit cycles, rising from 12.21 ± 3.201 at baseline to 19.18 ± 2.611 in the second follow-up audit ( F = 48.102, p < 0.001). Similarly, patients’/caregivers’ knowledge scores increased significantly from 9.00 ± 2.674 to 16.48 ± 2.987 ( F = 78.835, p < 0.001). Analysis across all audits revealed a significant reduction in both the incidence of hypoalbuminemia (from 17.1% to 2.2%; p = 0.048, Fisher's exact test) and complication rates (from 48.8% to 10.9%; χ 2 = 17.476, p < 0.001). Conclusions: The project successfully integrated evidence-based nutritional risk management into clinical practice, demonstrating that multidisciplinary team collaboration, systematic training, and protocol standardization can significantly enhance evidence-based practice and may improve patient outcomes. To ensure sustainability, ongoing education, regular audits, and expansion to other clinical units are recommended. Spanish abstract: https://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A676

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare
Published
2026-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/xeb.0000000000000644
Primary Topic
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nutritional risk management for stroke survivors with dysphagia in a rehabilitation department: a best practice implementation project

Qirong Chen, Xirongguli Halili, Canzhi Zhang, Lan Zhou et al.
International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
article

Nutritional risk management for stroke survivors with dysphagia in a rehabilitation department: a best practice implementation project

Qirong Chen, Xirongguli Halili, Canzhi Zhang, Lan Zhou, Li Wang, Dandan Qu, Xianwen Fan, Yuping Chen, Qiuxiang Mi, Min Xiao, Chenghui Wu
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction: Stroke survivors with dysphagia face a greater risk of malnutrition and life-threatening complications, yet evidence-based nutritional management in this population remains underutilized in clinical practice. Objective: This project aimed to implement and evaluate an evidence-based standardized nutritional risk management program for stroke survivors with dysphagia in a rehabilitation department in a hospital in China. Methods: This evidence implementation project was conducted using the JBI Evidence Implementation Framework, which is grounded in an audit and feedback process, along with a structured approach to identifying barriers to best practice recommendations. The audits included 28 health care professionals. Patient participation was 41 at baseline, 45 at first follow-up, and 46 at second follow-up. Compliance with 27 evidence-based audit criteria was evaluated, and four key barriers were identified, with corresponding change strategies implemented to address them. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, ANOVA, and χ 2 tests. Results: The majority of audit criteria showed significant improvement in compliance: 13 reached 100%, while the remaining 14 achieved a compliance rate exceeding 84%. Health care professionals’ knowledge scores of nutritional management demonstrated a significant increase across the three audit cycles, rising from 12.21 ± 3.201 at baseline to 19.18 ± 2.611 in the second follow-up audit ( F = 48.102, p < 0.001). Similarly, patients’/caregivers’ knowledge scores increased significantly from 9.00 ± 2.674 to 16.48 ± 2.987 ( F = 78.835, p < 0.001). Analysis across all audits revealed a significant reduction in both the incidence of hypoalbuminemia (from 17.1% to 2.2%; p = 0.048, Fisher's exact test) and complication rates (from 48.8% to 10.9%; χ 2 = 17.476, p < 0.001). Conclusions: The project successfully integrated evidence-based nutritional risk management into clinical practice, demonstrating that multidisciplinary team collaboration, systematic training, and protocol standardization can significantly enhance evidence-based practice and may improve patient outcomes. To ensure sustainability, ongoing education, regular audits, and expansion to other clinical units are recommended. Spanish abstract: https://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A676

International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare
Central South University (CN), Changsha Central Hospital (CN), Xiangya Hospital Central South University (CN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.