Microbial Communities Across Sports Surfaces: Exploring the Biology of Athletic Environments

Athletic environments—ranging from natural grass pitches and synthetic crumb–rubber turf to indoor mats and hardwood courts—are increasingly recognized as dynamic built-environment microbiomes rather than inert platforms. These surfaces are continuously exposed to human skin contact, perspiration and environmental debris, and may act as reservoirs for both beneficial commensals and opportunistic pathogens. The present study characterized and compared the taxonomic diversity of bacterial communities across four distinct sports surfaces and tested whether surface material or intensity of human use is the stronger determinant of community structure. Environmental swabs were collected from natural grass pitches, synthetic crumb–rubber turf, polyvinyl chloride (PVC) karate mats and hardwood squash courts, before and after sporting activity. Bacterial communities were profiled by 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, with taxonomic assignment against the SILVA reference database. Alpha diversity was quantified using the Shannon and Simpson indices, and community structure (beta diversity) was visualized by Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA) on Bray–Curtis dissimilarities. Surface material was the strongest predictor of microbial composition. Natural grass exhibited high alpha diversity dominated by soil-dwelling Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria, whereas synthetic surfaces showed reduced diversity but a markedly higher prevalence of human skin-associated taxa (Staphylococcus, Corynebacterium and Streptococcus). High-contact PVC mats underwent a significant relative enrichment in these skin-associated genera following active training. PCoA revealed clear spatial segregation by material. A multivariate PERMANOVA confirmed surface material as the primary driver of microbial structure, explaining 52.2% of the total variance (p < 0.001), whereas the intensity of human use (pre- vs. post-activity) explained only 2.8% of the variance (p = 0.035), with a non-significant interaction term (p = 0.178). These findings demonstrate that sports surfaces are living biological landscapes whose microbial fingerprint is strongly associated with specific surface types. This provides a molecular baseline for targeted hygiene interventions and future antimicrobial-material design tailored to specific athletic disciplines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Published
2026-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27167372
Primary Topic
Nail Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Microbial Communities Across Sports Surfaces: Exploring the Biology of Athletic Environments

Beata Łubkowska, Patrizia Proia, Magdalena Kropidłowska, Magdalena Dowgiałło
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Nail Diseases and Treatments
article

Microbial Communities Across Sports Surfaces: Exploring the Biology of Athletic Environments

Beata Łubkowska, Patrizia Proia, Magdalena Kropidłowska, Magdalena Dowgiałło
article en

Abstract

Athletic environments—ranging from natural grass pitches and synthetic crumb–rubber turf to indoor mats and hardwood courts—are increasingly recognized as dynamic built-environment microbiomes rather than inert platforms. These surfaces are continuously exposed to human skin contact, perspiration and environmental debris, and may act as reservoirs for both beneficial commensals and opportunistic pathogens. The present study characterized and compared the taxonomic diversity of bacterial communities across four distinct sports surfaces and tested whether surface material or intensity of human use is the stronger determinant of community structure. Environmental swabs were collected from natural grass pitches, synthetic crumb–rubber turf, polyvinyl chloride (PVC) karate mats and hardwood squash courts, before and after sporting activity. Bacterial communities were profiled by 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, with taxonomic assignment against the SILVA reference database. Alpha diversity was quantified using the Shannon and Simpson indices, and community structure (beta diversity) was visualized by Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA) on Bray–Curtis dissimilarities. Surface material was the strongest predictor of microbial composition. Natural grass exhibited high alpha diversity dominated by soil-dwelling Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria, whereas synthetic surfaces showed reduced diversity but a markedly higher prevalence of human skin-associated taxa (Staphylococcus, Corynebacterium and Streptococcus). High-contact PVC mats underwent a significant relative enrichment in these skin-associated genera following active training. PCoA revealed clear spatial segregation by material. A multivariate PERMANOVA confirmed surface material as the primary driver of microbial structure, explaining 52.2% of the total variance (p < 0.001), whereas the intensity of human use (pre- vs. post-activity) explained only 2.8% of the variance (p = 0.035), with a non-significant interaction term (p = 0.178). These findings demonstrate that sports surfaces are living biological landscapes whose microbial fingerprint is strongly associated with specific surface types. This provides a molecular baseline for targeted hygiene interventions and future antimicrobial-material design tailored to specific athletic disciplines.

International Journal of Molecular SciencesVol. 27(16)
Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport (PL), University of Palermo (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Nail Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.