Mission impossible? On the (in)commensurability of mission-oriented industrial policy and balanced regional development in contemporary Japan

This paper critically examines the commensurability of mission-oriented industrial policies (MOIPs) with balanced regional development in Japan. It demonstrates MOIPs’ implementation as premised on policy and regional path dependence. At the policy level, the MOIPs inherit structural biases from earlier strategies that prioritised high-productivity sectors and spatially concentrated investments. At the regional level, entrenched lock-ins, shaped by historical investments, institutions and localised infrastructures, constrain left-behind peripheral regions’ ability to adopt new industrial functions targeted by MOIPs. Consequently, contemporary MOIPs risk reinforcing spatial inequalities. Balanced regional development must become an explicit ‘grand challenge’ if MOIPs are to deliver broad-based, spatially equitable benefits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Regional Studies
Published
2026-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2026.2707136
Primary Topic
Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mission impossible? On the (in)commensurability of mission-oriented industrial policy and balanced regional development in contemporary Japan

Natsuki Kamakura, Kean Fan Lim
Regional Studies
Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis
article

Mission impossible? On the (in)commensurability of mission-oriented industrial policy and balanced regional development in contemporary Japan

Natsuki Kamakura, Kean Fan Lim
article en

Abstract

This paper critically examines the commensurability of mission-oriented industrial policies (MOIPs) with balanced regional development in Japan. It demonstrates MOIPs’ implementation as premised on policy and regional path dependence. At the policy level, the MOIPs inherit structural biases from earlier strategies that prioritised high-productivity sectors and spatially concentrated investments. At the regional level, entrenched lock-ins, shaped by historical investments, institutions and localised infrastructures, constrain left-behind peripheral regions’ ability to adopt new industrial functions targeted by MOIPs. Consequently, contemporary MOIPs risk reinforcing spatial inequalities. Balanced regional development must become an explicit ‘grand challenge’ if MOIPs are to deliver broad-based, spatially equitable benefits.

Regional StudiesVol. 60(1)
The University of Tokyo (JP), Newcastle University (GB)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.