Psychometric Validation of a Malay Language Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice Scale for Food Handlers Using EFA and Rasch Analysis

Food- and water-borne diseases remain a significant public health concern, with food handlers playing a critical role in ensuring food safety. However, no validated knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) questionnaire in Malay language has been established. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Malay language version of the KAP questionnaire among Malaysian food handlers using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and Rasch model analysis. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 298 food handlers in Johor, Malaysia, using convenience sampling. The instrument underwent translation, adaptation, and content validation prior to analysis. The data were suitable for factor analysis (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin = 0.824; Bartlett’s P < .001). Exploratory factor analysis supported a 3-factor structure, and item refinement resulted in improved internal consistency (Cronbach α = .841-.942). Rasch analysis demonstrated acceptable dimensionality for attitude and practice, satisfactory item fit, and appropriate rating scale functioning. Person reliability ranged from 0.70 to 0.86, with acceptable separation indices, although slightly lower for knowledge. Acceptable differential item functioning (DIF) was observed across education level and work experience, with all DIF values remaining within the predefined acceptable thresholds. The Malay-language KAP questionnaire is therefore a valid and reliable tool for assessing food safety-related knowledge, attitudes, and practices of food handlers in Malaysia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health
Published
2026-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10105395261473702
Primary Topic
Food Safety and Hygiene
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychometric Validation of a Malay Language Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice Scale for Food Handlers Using EFA and Rasch Analysis

Suriya Kumareswaran Vallasamy, Bala Murali Sundram
Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health
Food Safety and Hygiene
article

Psychometric Validation of a Malay Language Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice Scale for Food Handlers Using EFA and Rasch Analysis

Suriya Kumareswaran Vallasamy, Bala Murali Sundram
article en

Abstract

Food- and water-borne diseases remain a significant public health concern, with food handlers playing a critical role in ensuring food safety. However, no validated knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) questionnaire in Malay language has been established. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Malay language version of the KAP questionnaire among Malaysian food handlers using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and Rasch model analysis. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 298 food handlers in Johor, Malaysia, using convenience sampling. The instrument underwent translation, adaptation, and content validation prior to analysis. The data were suitable for factor analysis (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin = 0.824; Bartlett’s P < .001). Exploratory factor analysis supported a 3-factor structure, and item refinement resulted in improved internal consistency (Cronbach α = .841-.942). Rasch analysis demonstrated acceptable dimensionality for attitude and practice, satisfactory item fit, and appropriate rating scale functioning. Person reliability ranged from 0.70 to 0.86, with acceptable separation indices, although slightly lower for knowledge. Acceptable differential item functioning (DIF) was observed across education level and work experience, with all DIF values remaining within the predefined acceptable thresholds. The Malay-language KAP questionnaire is therefore a valid and reliable tool for assessing food safety-related knowledge, attitudes, and practices of food handlers in Malaysia.

Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health
University of Malaya (MY), Newcastle University Medicine Malaysia (MY)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Food Safety and Hygiene
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.