Planner-level variation in sustainability regulation: agency in statutory planning practice

This study examines planner-level variation in sustainability-related plan regulations and relates this variation to planners’ self-assessments. The study combines quantitative regulation analysis and survey-based self-assessments with qualitative responses, linking local detailed plan regulations to planners. The analysis identifies variation within shared institutional conditions and compares observed regulatory profiles with planners’ assigned importance, self-assessed knowledge, and reported opportunity to influence plan content. Observed regulatory frequency aligned more closely with self-assessed knowledge and reported opportunity than with assigned importance. The findings show how planner-linked variation in legally binding planning outputs, interpreted alongside self-assessments, provides one empirical basis for examining situated professional agency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urban Research & Practice
Published
2026-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2026.2713585
Primary Topic
Urban Planning and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Planner-level variation in sustainability regulation: agency in statutory planning practice

Mari Jaakonaho
Urban Research & Practice
Urban Planning and Governance
article

Planner-level variation in sustainability regulation: agency in statutory planning practice

Mari Jaakonaho
article en

Abstract

This study examines planner-level variation in sustainability-related plan regulations and relates this variation to planners’ self-assessments. The study combines quantitative regulation analysis and survey-based self-assessments with qualitative responses, linking local detailed plan regulations to planners. The analysis identifies variation within shared institutional conditions and compares observed regulatory profiles with planners’ assigned importance, self-assessed knowledge, and reported opportunity to influence plan content. Observed regulatory frequency aligned more closely with self-assessed knowledge and reported opportunity than with assigned importance. The findings show how planner-linked variation in legally binding planning outputs, interpreted alongside self-assessments, provides one empirical basis for examining situated professional agency.

Urban Research & Practice
Tampere University (FI)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Urban Planning and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.