Agricultural Drainflow: Landscape risk mapping to facilitate field level risk assessments of plant protection products in Great Britain

To date, there are very few studies focusing on risk mapping of agricultural drainflow losses of pesticides in Great Britain (GB). A spatially distributed landscape implementation of the UK higher tier drainflow environmental risk assessment modelling framework at 1 km resolution was developed for three example pesticide active substances and used to derive substance-specific drainflow risk index (DFRI) maps covering GB. The DFRI mapping approach comprised of: (A) definition of high-resolution landscape scenarios in the drainflow simulation modelling that would underpin the DFRI; and (B) construction of 2 and 3 class bivariate DFRI aligned with the existing GB regulatory approach for use in field scale risk assessment and communication. Visual comparison of the DFRI maps for the three active substances indicates the influence of substance properties, with the mobile non-persistent substance demonstrating large areas of safe use, while the slightly-mobile moderately persistent substance demonstrated less low-risk areas. Across all three substance DFRI maps, there are locations where no/few drained soils are present, indicating inherently safe usage locations exist alongside the low-risk areas. A limiting factor of the DFRI approach is the reliance on generalised soil association data as being an accurate representation of the soils actually present at a location. The DFRI approach offers an opportunity to move away from a binary regulatory decision of a product being registered or not, to one that allows use in locations where it is safe to do so, while prohibiting use in those locations where it is not. This more targeted approach would allow users access to a wider range of crop protection options to leverage greater benefits whilst simultaneously reducing risks to aquatic habitats. In order to adopt such an approach, regulators would require reassurance that users could undertake and comply with the results of a field level risk assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
Published
2026-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/inteam/vjag137
Primary Topic
Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Agricultural Drainflow: Landscape risk mapping to facilitate field level risk assessments of plant protection products in Great Britain

Robin Sur, Abdul Abu, G. Hughes, Adrian Terry et al.
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
article

Agricultural Drainflow: Landscape risk mapping to facilitate field level risk assessments of plant protection products in Great Britain

Robin Sur, Abdul Abu, G. Hughes, Adrian Terry, Kirk Hill
article en

Abstract

To date, there are very few studies focusing on risk mapping of agricultural drainflow losses of pesticides in Great Britain (GB). A spatially distributed landscape implementation of the UK higher tier drainflow environmental risk assessment modelling framework at 1 km resolution was developed for three example pesticide active substances and used to derive substance-specific drainflow risk index (DFRI) maps covering GB. The DFRI mapping approach comprised of: (A) definition of high-resolution landscape scenarios in the drainflow simulation modelling that would underpin the DFRI; and (B) construction of 2 and 3 class bivariate DFRI aligned with the existing GB regulatory approach for use in field scale risk assessment and communication. Visual comparison of the DFRI maps for the three active substances indicates the influence of substance properties, with the mobile non-persistent substance demonstrating large areas of safe use, while the slightly-mobile moderately persistent substance demonstrated less low-risk areas. Across all three substance DFRI maps, there are locations where no/few drained soils are present, indicating inherently safe usage locations exist alongside the low-risk areas. A limiting factor of the DFRI approach is the reliance on generalised soil association data as being an accurate representation of the soils actually present at a location. The DFRI approach offers an opportunity to move away from a binary regulatory decision of a product being registered or not, to one that allows use in locations where it is safe to do so, while prohibiting use in those locations where it is not. This more targeted approach would allow users access to a wider range of crop protection options to leverage greater benefits whilst simultaneously reducing risks to aquatic habitats. In order to adopt such an approach, regulators would require reassurance that users could undertake and comply with the results of a field level risk assessment.

Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
University of Wolverhampton (GB), Agricultural Development Advisory Service (United Kingdom) (GB), Geospatial Research (United Kingdom) (GB), RSK Assessments (United States) (US), Bayer (Germany) (DE)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.