Sensory marketing cartography: A theory on sensory mappings

Abstract Sensory mapping, the process by which a sensory stimulus elicits a consumer response, is central to effective sensory marketing. Yet, research on the topic remains fragmented. First, the prevalence of construct proliferation, where a lack of distinction between a continuously growing array of similar terms, raises questions about how different types of sensory mappings should be defined. Second, sensory mappings have often been studied in isolation, even though they are interrelated in practice, where one stimulus can diverge into multiple responses and multiple stimuli can converge on a single response. Third, sensory stimuli are prone to mixed outcomes, enhancing or harming consumer evaluations. This paper addresses these challenges in two steps. First, a typology delineating sensory mappings based on sensory stimuli (physical vs. lexical) and consumer responses (sensory vs. semantic) is developed, yielding four key variants: sensory correspondence, semantic correspondence, sensory communication, and semantic communication. Second, a conceptual model is provided with propositions explaining how these sensory mapping types can be combined and how stimuli intensity and individual differences act as boundary conditions that explain mixed outcomes. Together, these frameworks underpin a future research agenda that offers directions to advance sensory marketing theory and practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AMS Review
Published
2026-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-026-00351-2
Primary Topic
Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sensory marketing cartography: A theory on sensory mappings

Tianyi Zhang, Kane Koh
AMS Review
Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
article

Sensory marketing cartography: A theory on sensory mappings

Tianyi Zhang, Kane Koh
article en

Abstract

Abstract Sensory mapping, the process by which a sensory stimulus elicits a consumer response, is central to effective sensory marketing. Yet, research on the topic remains fragmented. First, the prevalence of construct proliferation, where a lack of distinction between a continuously growing array of similar terms, raises questions about how different types of sensory mappings should be defined. Second, sensory mappings have often been studied in isolation, even though they are interrelated in practice, where one stimulus can diverge into multiple responses and multiple stimuli can converge on a single response. Third, sensory stimuli are prone to mixed outcomes, enhancing or harming consumer evaluations. This paper addresses these challenges in two steps. First, a typology delineating sensory mappings based on sensory stimuli (physical vs. lexical) and consumer responses (sensory vs. semantic) is developed, yielding four key variants: sensory correspondence, semantic correspondence, sensory communication, and semantic communication. Second, a conceptual model is provided with propositions explaining how these sensory mapping types can be combined and how stimuli intensity and individual differences act as boundary conditions that explain mixed outcomes. Together, these frameworks underpin a future research agenda that offers directions to advance sensory marketing theory and practice.

AMS ReviewVol. 16(2)
University of Oxford (GB), MIT University (MK), Department of Finance (AU), RMIT University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.