Decolonising Peacebuilding: The Role of Indigenous Knowledge Systems in Sustainable Peace

ABSTRACT This article explores the transformative potential of Indigenous knowledge systems in peacebuilding, offering a decolonial alternative to Western‐centric paradigms. Drawing on case studies from the Māori of Aotearoa New Zealand, the Diné (Navajo) Nation, and the Sami of Sápmi, this work advances how Indigenous principles of interconnectedness, reciprocity, and harmony with nature can address the root causes of conflict and foster sustainable peace. The article critiques the limitations of liberal peacebuilding, including its neglect of cultural and spiritual dimensions and its perpetuation of colonial power dynamics. It also examines challenges such as appropriation, scalability, and structural resistance, offering recommendations for centring Indigenous voices, building ethical partnerships, and advocating for systemic change. The article compares three colonial setups: bicultural treaty state, federal hegemon, and multi‐state green extractivist complex, arguing that decolonial peacebuilding demands context‐specific strategies and a pluriversal peace must originate from within these specificities rather than from above them.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Peace &amp Change
Published
2026-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/pech.70091
Primary Topic
Peacebuilding and International Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decolonising Peacebuilding: The Role of Indigenous Knowledge Systems in Sustainable Peace

Sudipto Mondal
Peace &amp Change
Peacebuilding and International Security
article

Decolonising Peacebuilding: The Role of Indigenous Knowledge Systems in Sustainable Peace

Sudipto Mondal
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article explores the transformative potential of Indigenous knowledge systems in peacebuilding, offering a decolonial alternative to Western‐centric paradigms. Drawing on case studies from the Māori of Aotearoa New Zealand, the Diné (Navajo) Nation, and the Sami of Sápmi, this work advances how Indigenous principles of interconnectedness, reciprocity, and harmony with nature can address the root causes of conflict and foster sustainable peace. The article critiques the limitations of liberal peacebuilding, including its neglect of cultural and spiritual dimensions and its perpetuation of colonial power dynamics. It also examines challenges such as appropriation, scalability, and structural resistance, offering recommendations for centring Indigenous voices, building ethical partnerships, and advocating for systemic change. The article compares three colonial setups: bicultural treaty state, federal hegemon, and multi‐state green extractivist complex, arguing that decolonial peacebuilding demands context‐specific strategies and a pluriversal peace must originate from within these specificities rather than from above them.

Peace &amp Change
Pondicherry University (IN)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Peacebuilding and International Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.