Identifying Velopharyngeal Dysfunction in Head and Neck Cancer Patients

OBJECTIVE(S): To characterize the clinical features and risk factors associated with velopharyngeal dysfunction (VPD) following head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment. METHODS: Patients with HNC and subsequent VPD-related symptoms were identified through electronic query and manual chart review across three tertiary centers. Demographic, oncologic, and treatment variables, including tumor subsite, T stage, treatment modality, and radiation dose, were collected. VPD-related outcomes included hypernasality, nasal regurgitation, reduced intelligibility, and evidence of velopharyngeal insufficiency on endoscopy. Associations were evaluated using univariate tests and logistic regression, with radiation dose modeled as a continuous variable. RESULTS: A total of 142 patients met inclusion criteria. The most common primary tumor subsites in this cohort were oropharyngeal and oral cavity. Advanced-stage disease (T3-T4) was more common than early-stage disease (Tis-T2) and was associated with nasal regurgitation. Higher radiation dose was associated with increased likelihood of endoscopic VPD, with a dose-response relationship observed; however, this association was not observed for clinical outcomes. Latency to VPD onset varied by treatment modality, with shorter latency following surgery and longer latency following radiation-based therapies. Speech-language pathology (SLP) evaluation was commonly performed; however, standardized symptom outcome metrics and instrumental assessments were inconsistent and underutilized across institutions. CONCLUSION: VPD is an underrecognized sequela of HNC treatment, and may be associated with primary tumor subsite, advanced disease, and radiation dose. Treatment modality contributes to latency in VPD diagnosis. Variability in SLP evaluation and outcome measurement highlights the need for more standardized assessment approaches to improve identification and management of VPD in this population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Laryngoscope
Published
2026-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.70792
Primary Topic
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying Velopharyngeal Dysfunction in Head and Neck Cancer Patients

Hilary McCrary, Holly Hess, Peter Larner, Kenneth Newman et al.
The Laryngoscope
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
article

Identifying Velopharyngeal Dysfunction in Head and Neck Cancer Patients

Hilary McCrary, Holly Hess, Peter Larner, Kenneth Newman, Vanessa Torrecillas, Robbi A. Kupfer, Andrew Neevel, Lauren Boeckermann, Margaret Tiner
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE(S): To characterize the clinical features and risk factors associated with velopharyngeal dysfunction (VPD) following head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment. METHODS: Patients with HNC and subsequent VPD-related symptoms were identified through electronic query and manual chart review across three tertiary centers. Demographic, oncologic, and treatment variables, including tumor subsite, T stage, treatment modality, and radiation dose, were collected. VPD-related outcomes included hypernasality, nasal regurgitation, reduced intelligibility, and evidence of velopharyngeal insufficiency on endoscopy. Associations were evaluated using univariate tests and logistic regression, with radiation dose modeled as a continuous variable. RESULTS: A total of 142 patients met inclusion criteria. The most common primary tumor subsites in this cohort were oropharyngeal and oral cavity. Advanced-stage disease (T3-T4) was more common than early-stage disease (Tis-T2) and was associated with nasal regurgitation. Higher radiation dose was associated with increased likelihood of endoscopic VPD, with a dose-response relationship observed; however, this association was not observed for clinical outcomes. Latency to VPD onset varied by treatment modality, with shorter latency following surgery and longer latency following radiation-based therapies. Speech-language pathology (SLP) evaluation was commonly performed; however, standardized symptom outcome metrics and instrumental assessments were inconsistent and underutilized across institutions. CONCLUSION: VPD is an underrecognized sequela of HNC treatment, and may be associated with primary tumor subsite, advanced disease, and radiation dose. Treatment modality contributes to latency in VPD diagnosis. Variability in SLP evaluation and outcome measurement highlights the need for more standardized assessment approaches to improve identification and management of VPD in this population.

The Laryngoscope
University of Utah (US), University of Michigan (US), University of Virginia (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.