How Common Is Abortion Coercion? Evidence From a Large <scp>US</scp> Sample of People Assigned Male at Birth

OBJECTIVE: Reproductive coercion encompasses a range of partner behaviors that violate reproductive autonomy, including contraceptive sabotage, coercion to become pregnant, and controlling pregnancy outcome (i.e., forced continuation or termination). Coerced abortion is often cited as a reason to restrict abortion access. We examined data on the prevalence of reproductive coercion behaviors including abortion coercion. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 3199 people living in the United States and assigned male at birth, administered by Prolific, which measured lifetime use of 13 reproductive coercion behaviors. RESULTS: Participants most commonly removed condoms without consent (13.1%) and refused to use condoms (8.8%). 2.0% of participants reported attempts to force abortion and 4.3% reported blocking abortion access. CONCLUSION: Restricting abortion access was twice as common as forced abortion, undermining legislative rationales for abortion restrictions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
Published
2026-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/psrh.70077
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Contraception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Common Is Abortion Coercion? Evidence From a Large US Sample of People Assigned Male at Birth

Elizabeth Miller, Karen Trister Grace, Elizabeth Tobin‐Tyler
Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
Reproductive Health and Contraception
article

How Common Is Abortion Coercion? Evidence From a Large US Sample of People Assigned Male at Birth

Elizabeth Miller, Karen Trister Grace, Elizabeth Tobin‐Tyler
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Reproductive coercion encompasses a range of partner behaviors that violate reproductive autonomy, including contraceptive sabotage, coercion to become pregnant, and controlling pregnancy outcome (i.e., forced continuation or termination). Coerced abortion is often cited as a reason to restrict abortion access. We examined data on the prevalence of reproductive coercion behaviors including abortion coercion. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 3199 people living in the United States and assigned male at birth, administered by Prolific, which measured lifetime use of 13 reproductive coercion behaviors. RESULTS: Participants most commonly removed condoms without consent (13.1%) and refused to use condoms (8.8%). 2.0% of participants reported attempts to force abortion and 4.3% reported blocking abortion access. CONCLUSION: Restricting abortion access was twice as common as forced abortion, undermining legislative rationales for abortion restrictions.

Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
George Mason University (US), University of Pittsburgh (US), Brown University (US), National Center For Child Health and Development (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Reproductive Health and Contraception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.