What works? A framework analysis of breastfeeding support provider perspectives in a low-breastfeeding region with baby friendly accreditation

Abstract Background Evidence-based breastfeeding support interventions can improve breastfeeding rates. However, in Northern Ireland breastfeeding rates remain amongst the lowest worldwide despite 100% UNICEF BFI accreditation of maternity units, and the availability of community and private breastfeeding support. There is limited understanding of the provider perspective on factors that influence their ability to provide effective support in such contexts. This study aimed to explore the provider perspective of supporting women to breastfeed across a range of role-types in a context with low breastfeeding rates, yet high rates of UNICEF BFI accreditation across maternity and family settings. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with trained breastfeeding support providers employed in healthcare roles ( n = 12) and lay trained providers ( n = 9). A thematic framework analysis was undertaken. Results Three key themes were developed from the dataset: Role development through active engagement , Positivity: Breastfeeding support as meaningful work , and Negativity: Precarity in quality support provision . Findings suggest a range of positive and negative factors underpinning support provision. Positive factors were most evident when providers were regularly exposed to positive breastfeeding support encounters with women, and where breastfeeding was normalised, understood and valued within healthcare systems and by individuals. Conclusions Breastfeeding support providers develop confidence and skill through experiential learning and collaboration with others who value breastfeeding. This can be undermined by limited exposure to breastfeeding in low-breastfeeding contexts, and a lack of support for providers themselves in practice despite a system’s BFI accreditation status. Providers can therefore struggle to fully enact their breastfeeding support role despite UNICEF BFI accreditation. What works best for providers to support breastfeeding women is continued exposure to breastfeeding dyads, ongoing peer learning from other providers who value and understand breastfeeding practices, and strong team cohesion across professional and lay-trained roles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Breastfeeding Journal
Published
2026-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-026-00881-2
Primary Topic
Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What works? A framework analysis of breastfeeding support provider perspectives in a low-breastfeeding region with baby friendly accreditation

Mary Jo Chesnel, Maria Healy, Jenny McNeill
International Breastfeeding Journal
Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
article

What works? A framework analysis of breastfeeding support provider perspectives in a low-breastfeeding region with baby friendly accreditation

Mary Jo Chesnel, Maria Healy, Jenny McNeill
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Evidence-based breastfeeding support interventions can improve breastfeeding rates. However, in Northern Ireland breastfeeding rates remain amongst the lowest worldwide despite 100% UNICEF BFI accreditation of maternity units, and the availability of community and private breastfeeding support. There is limited understanding of the provider perspective on factors that influence their ability to provide effective support in such contexts. This study aimed to explore the provider perspective of supporting women to breastfeed across a range of role-types in a context with low breastfeeding rates, yet high rates of UNICEF BFI accreditation across maternity and family settings. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with trained breastfeeding support providers employed in healthcare roles ( n = 12) and lay trained providers ( n = 9). A thematic framework analysis was undertaken. Results Three key themes were developed from the dataset: Role development through active engagement , Positivity: Breastfeeding support as meaningful work , and Negativity: Precarity in quality support provision . Findings suggest a range of positive and negative factors underpinning support provision. Positive factors were most evident when providers were regularly exposed to positive breastfeeding support encounters with women, and where breastfeeding was normalised, understood and valued within healthcare systems and by individuals. Conclusions Breastfeeding support providers develop confidence and skill through experiential learning and collaboration with others who value breastfeeding. This can be undermined by limited exposure to breastfeeding in low-breastfeeding contexts, and a lack of support for providers themselves in practice despite a system’s BFI accreditation status. Providers can therefore struggle to fully enact their breastfeeding support role despite UNICEF BFI accreditation. What works best for providers to support breastfeeding women is continued exposure to breastfeeding dyads, ongoing peer learning from other providers who value and understand breastfeeding practices, and strong team cohesion across professional and lay-trained roles.

International Breastfeeding Journal
Queen's University Belfast (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.