Development and application of a framework for classifying stakeholder roles in co-creation research: a Health CASCADE study

Abstract Aim Given the diversity of stakeholder engagement in co-creation research and the absence of an operational classification of stakeholder roles, this study aimed to develop a classification framework for co-creator roles and demonstrate its practical application in classifying stakeholder engagement. Subject and methods To develop the co-creation roles framework, we searched Google Images and Google Scholar to identify concepts and frameworks relevant to co-creation roles. To demonstrate its application, we applied the framework to classify stakeholder roles in studies on youth co-creation in public health interventions. Studies were identified through a systematic review using four databases (OVID/Medline, Ebsco/APA PsycINFO, Ebsco/CINAHL, Elsevier/Scopus), following PRISMA guidelines and registering the protocol on PROSPERO (CRD42024628813). Results The Google Images and Google Scholar search yielded five articles addressing co-creation role elements such as ‘stages of co-creation’ and ‘stakeholder levels of engagement’. The systematic review included 39 articles describing n = 19 youth-focused public health projects underpinned by co-creation ( n = 9), youth participatory action research ( n = 7) or community-based participatory research ( n = 3), revealing stakeholder engagement at multiple levels. Conclusion This study presents an operational classification framework for describing co-creation roles among diverse stakeholders, providing a practical approach to improving transparency and comparability across co-creation research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Public Health
Published
2026-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-026-02881-2
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and application of a framework for classifying stakeholder roles in co-creation research: a Health CASCADE study

Katrina Messiha, Mai J. M. Chinapaw, Teatske M. Altenburg, Johannes C. F. Ket et al.
Journal of Public Health
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
article

Development and application of a framework for classifying stakeholder roles in co-creation research: a Health CASCADE study

Katrina Messiha, Mai J. M. Chinapaw, Teatske M. Altenburg, Johannes C. F. Ket, Renée I. Wink
article en

Abstract

Abstract Aim Given the diversity of stakeholder engagement in co-creation research and the absence of an operational classification of stakeholder roles, this study aimed to develop a classification framework for co-creator roles and demonstrate its practical application in classifying stakeholder engagement. Subject and methods To develop the co-creation roles framework, we searched Google Images and Google Scholar to identify concepts and frameworks relevant to co-creation roles. To demonstrate its application, we applied the framework to classify stakeholder roles in studies on youth co-creation in public health interventions. Studies were identified through a systematic review using four databases (OVID/Medline, Ebsco/APA PsycINFO, Ebsco/CINAHL, Elsevier/Scopus), following PRISMA guidelines and registering the protocol on PROSPERO (CRD42024628813). Results The Google Images and Google Scholar search yielded five articles addressing co-creation role elements such as ‘stages of co-creation’ and ‘stakeholder levels of engagement’. The systematic review included 39 articles describing n = 19 youth-focused public health projects underpinned by co-creation ( n = 9), youth participatory action research ( n = 7) or community-based participatory research ( n = 3), revealing stakeholder engagement at multiple levels. Conclusion This study presents an operational classification framework for describing co-creation roles among diverse stakeholders, providing a practical approach to improving transparency and comparability across co-creation research.

Journal of Public Health
Department of Public (IN), Public Health Service of Amsterdam (NL), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
European Commission, HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.