An ambiguous ally: Canada’s pro-LGBTQ+ foreign policy

Since 2015, Canada has become one of the most important defenders of the rights of sexual and gender minorities around the world. This article analyzes Canada’s record as a pro-LGBTQ+ foreign policy actor, focusing on its actions between 2015 and 2025. More specifically, we explore the degree to which the Canadian government’s strategies and practices reflect characteristics of a “good ally” in its relationship with LGBTQ+ civil society organizations. We develop a framework of “good allyship” as an analytical tool, based on three components – the demonstration of commitment, the institutionalization of support and relationship building – and then apply it to the Canadian case. We find that Canada occupies an ambiguous position as an ally. Although Canada has demonstrated good commitment, it might not be sustained, its institutionalization is limited, and the relationships fall short of equitable, long-term partnerships.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Foreign Policy Journal
Published
2026-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/11926422.2026.2707597
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An ambiguous ally: Canada’s pro-LGBTQ+ foreign policy

Morgane Rosier, Momin Rahman, Stephen Brown, Bartosz Neumann
Canadian Foreign Policy Journal
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

An ambiguous ally: Canada’s pro-LGBTQ+ foreign policy

Morgane Rosier, Momin Rahman, Stephen Brown, Bartosz Neumann
article en

Abstract

Since 2015, Canada has become one of the most important defenders of the rights of sexual and gender minorities around the world. This article analyzes Canada’s record as a pro-LGBTQ+ foreign policy actor, focusing on its actions between 2015 and 2025. More specifically, we explore the degree to which the Canadian government’s strategies and practices reflect characteristics of a “good ally” in its relationship with LGBTQ+ civil society organizations. We develop a framework of “good allyship” as an analytical tool, based on three components – the demonstration of commitment, the institutionalization of support and relationship building – and then apply it to the Canadian case. We find that Canada occupies an ambiguous position as an ally. Although Canada has demonstrated good commitment, it might not be sustained, its institutionalization is limited, and the relationships fall short of equitable, long-term partnerships.

Canadian Foreign Policy Journal
University of Ottawa (CA), Université du Québec à Montréal (CA), Concordia University (CA), Trent University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.