Predicting Vision-Threatening Retinopathy in Patients With Diabetes Using Patient-Reported Data: Impact on Reading Center Workflow Efficiency

Purpose: First-come, first-served (FCFS) image review may delay identification of patients with vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy (VTDR). We developed a machine learning triage model using patient-reported clinical data to predict VTDR and evaluated its potential effect on reading-center workflow. Methods: We developed an ensemble model using XGBoost, CatBoost, and LightGBM in 9403 patients with diabetes imaged at the Alexandria iCare Retina Reading Center. Analyses were performed at the patient level using a worse-eye definition, with VTDR defined as severe nonproliferative DR or worse or diabetic macular edema. Predictors included demographic variables, comorbidities, smoking status, diabetes therapy, and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) when available. Model performance was evaluated with and without HbA1c. After model development, workflow simulations compared standard FCFS review with model-based prioritization and model plus prior-treatment prioritization. Results: The ensemble model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.89 with HbA1c and 0.87 without. With HbA1c, sensitivity was 74.8%, specificity was 88.6%, positive predictive value was 80.3%, and negative predictive value was 85.0%. In the 6-month workflow simulation, the mean time to evaluation for confirmed VTDR decreased from 57.08 ± 18.11 minutes with FCFS review to 48.86 ± 16.02 minutes with model-only prioritization and 43.01 ± 15.89 minutes with model plus prior-treatment prioritization. Conclusions: A patient-reported machine learning triage model identified patients at higher risk of VTDR and improved prioritization in simulated reading-center workflows. Translational Relevance: Patient-reported triage may help reading centers to prioritize high-risk patients while preserving human grading.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Translational Vision Science & Technology
Published
2026-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.15.8.15
Primary Topic
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting Vision-Threatening Retinopathy in Patients With Diabetes Using Patient-Reported Data: Impact on Reading Center Workflow Efficiency

Mostafa El Manhaly, Enas Khamis, Mohamed Ashraf, Merna Mostafa et al.
Translational Vision Science & Technology
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
article

Predicting Vision-Threatening Retinopathy in Patients With Diabetes Using Patient-Reported Data: Impact on Reading Center Workflow Efficiency

Mostafa El Manhaly, Enas Khamis, Mohamed Ashraf, Merna Mostafa, Mohamed Ghoneim, Ahmed Souka, Nadine Khaled, Bassma Al-Bayoumy, Heba Abdelaziz, Amira Mostafa, Lloyd Paul Aiello, Paolo Silva
article en

Abstract

Purpose: First-come, first-served (FCFS) image review may delay identification of patients with vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy (VTDR). We developed a machine learning triage model using patient-reported clinical data to predict VTDR and evaluated its potential effect on reading-center workflow. Methods: We developed an ensemble model using XGBoost, CatBoost, and LightGBM in 9403 patients with diabetes imaged at the Alexandria iCare Retina Reading Center. Analyses were performed at the patient level using a worse-eye definition, with VTDR defined as severe nonproliferative DR or worse or diabetic macular edema. Predictors included demographic variables, comorbidities, smoking status, diabetes therapy, and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) when available. Model performance was evaluated with and without HbA1c. After model development, workflow simulations compared standard FCFS review with model-based prioritization and model plus prior-treatment prioritization. Results: The ensemble model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.89 with HbA1c and 0.87 without. With HbA1c, sensitivity was 74.8%, specificity was 88.6%, positive predictive value was 80.3%, and negative predictive value was 85.0%. In the 6-month workflow simulation, the mean time to evaluation for confirmed VTDR decreased from 57.08 ± 18.11 minutes with FCFS review to 48.86 ± 16.02 minutes with model-only prioritization and 43.01 ± 15.89 minutes with model plus prior-treatment prioritization. Conclusions: A patient-reported machine learning triage model identified patients at higher risk of VTDR and improved prioritization in simulated reading-center workflows. Translational Relevance: Patient-reported triage may help reading centers to prioritize high-risk patients while preserving human grading.

Translational Vision Science & TechnologyVol. 15(8)
Joslin Diabetes Center (US), Harvard University (US), Alexandria University (EG)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.