Circular Economy and Sustainable Development: Evidence From Green Innovation, Energy Transition, and Green Investment on Ecological Footprint in <scp>G7</scp> Countries

ABSTRACT Achieving sustainable development in advanced economies requires accelerating the transition toward a circular economy while mitigating escalating ecological pressures. Despite growing policy attention, evidence remains limited on the joint effects of green finance, green innovation, municipal waste recycling, energy transition, economic growth, and population on the ecological footprint in the G7 countries during 1995–2023. Using a multivariate quantile‐on‐quantile regression framework, this study captures distributional heterogeneity in the relationships between these determinants and the ecological footprint. The results show that green finance consistently reduces the ecological footprint, with stronger mitigation effects beyond the middle quantiles. In contrast, green innovation and municipal waste recycling show positive effects across most quantiles, while the effect of energy transition is heterogeneous, remaining positive at lower and middle quantiles before becoming slightly negative at the highest quantiles. Economic growth and population also increase the ecological footprint, with the impact of economic growth becoming substantially stronger at higher quantiles. To address potential endogeneity, instrumental variable quantile regression with lagged instruments is employed, and the results remain robust. For managers, the results highlight the importance of directing green finance toward projects with demonstrable environmental benefits while systematically evaluating the environmental performance of innovation, recycling, and energy transition initiatives to ensure that circular economy investments translate into lower ecological pressure. By revealing how the effects of circular economy drivers vary across ecological footprint regimes, this study provides targeted guidance for policymakers and business leaders seeking to strengthen long‐term ecological sustainability and advance the Sustainable Development Goals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Development
Published
2026-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.71560
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Circular Economy and Sustainable Development: Evidence From Green Innovation, Energy Transition, and Green Investment on Ecological Footprint in G7 Countries

Hamid Ghazi H Sulimany, Abdulrahman Atllah Alharbi, Shah Asadullah Mohd. Zobair, Sohidul Islam et al.
Sustainable Development
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
article

Circular Economy and Sustainable Development: Evidence From Green Innovation, Energy Transition, and Green Investment on Ecological Footprint in G7 Countries

Hamid Ghazi H Sulimany, Abdulrahman Atllah Alharbi, Shah Asadullah Mohd. Zobair, Sohidul Islam, Md. Mustaqim Roshid, Reday Chandra Bhowmik
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Achieving sustainable development in advanced economies requires accelerating the transition toward a circular economy while mitigating escalating ecological pressures. Despite growing policy attention, evidence remains limited on the joint effects of green finance, green innovation, municipal waste recycling, energy transition, economic growth, and population on the ecological footprint in the G7 countries during 1995–2023. Using a multivariate quantile‐on‐quantile regression framework, this study captures distributional heterogeneity in the relationships between these determinants and the ecological footprint. The results show that green finance consistently reduces the ecological footprint, with stronger mitigation effects beyond the middle quantiles. In contrast, green innovation and municipal waste recycling show positive effects across most quantiles, while the effect of energy transition is heterogeneous, remaining positive at lower and middle quantiles before becoming slightly negative at the highest quantiles. Economic growth and population also increase the ecological footprint, with the impact of economic growth becoming substantially stronger at higher quantiles. To address potential endogeneity, instrumental variable quantile regression with lagged instruments is employed, and the results remain robust. For managers, the results highlight the importance of directing green finance toward projects with demonstrable environmental benefits while systematically evaluating the environmental performance of innovation, recycling, and energy transition initiatives to ensure that circular economy investments translate into lower ecological pressure. By revealing how the effects of circular economy drivers vary across ecological footprint regimes, this study provides targeted guidance for policymakers and business leaders seeking to strengthen long‐term ecological sustainability and advance the Sustainable Development Goals.

Sustainable Development
International Islamic University Chittagong (BD), Taif University (SA), Comilla University (BD), Bangladesh Sericulture Research and Training Institute (BD), University of Rajshahi (BD)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.