Factors Influencing Nursing Internship Students’ Readiness to Use AI: Cross-Sectional Study Using Neural Network Analysis

Abstract Background Enhancing nursing students’ awareness, attitudes, beliefs, and preparedness toward AI may help improve their health care knowledge and practice. Objective This study aimed to assess nursing students’ attitudes, perceptions, self-efficacy, barriers, and anxiety, which influence their readiness to adopt AI in nursing practice. Methods This study used a cross-sectional, correlational design. Data were collected from 307 nursing internship students using an 8-part, self-administered questionnaire. Results Increased self-efficacy with computers was correlated with decreased barriers to accessing AI technology, lower computer anxiety scale scores ( r =−0.27, P <.001 and r =−0.57, P <.001, respectively), and higher perceptions of using AI ( r =0.27, P <.001). Meanwhile, nursing students’ readiness to adopt AI in nursing practice was negatively associated with barriers to accessing AI technology ( r =−0.20, P <.001) and positively associated with attitudes toward and perceptions of using AI ( r =0.32, P <.001 and r =0.14, P =.01, respectively). Increased barriers to accessing AI technology were associated with negative attitudes toward AI and nursing students’ perceptions of using AI ( r =−0.34, P <.001 and r =−0.39, P <.001, respectively). A multilayer neural network model identified barriers (relative importance=0.27), attitudes (relative importance=0.16), and perceptions (relative importance=0.15) as the most significant predictors, while self-efficacy (relative importance=0.11) and anxiety (relative importance=0.07) showed smaller contributions, despite nonsignificant bivariate associations with nursing students’ AI readiness. The model demonstrated strong predictive performance, achieving a low relative error of 0.62 in the training set. The stability and generalization ability of the model were supported by the training and testing set results, which yielded a training sum of squares error of 65.93 and a testing sum of squares error of 35.49, showing no signs of overfitting. Conclusions Several contributing factors influenced nursing students’ readiness to embrace AI, with barriers, attitudes, and perceptions emerging as the most consistent, whereas self-efficacy and anxiety may play indirect roles. To improve the adoption of AI among nursing students, such factors should be dealt with in such educational programs; an interrelated adoption of AI in nursing practice is expounded as a more favorable environment.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
JMIR Nursing
Published
2026-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/92533
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors Influencing Nursing Internship Students’ Readiness to Use AI: Cross-Sectional Study Using Neural Network Analysis

Hamdan Albaqawi, Abdulhafith Alharbi, Bushra Alshammari, Awatif Alrasheeday et al.
JMIR Nursing
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Factors Influencing Nursing Internship Students’ Readiness to Use AI: Cross-Sectional Study Using Neural Network Analysis

Hamdan Albaqawi, Abdulhafith Alharbi, Bushra Alshammari, Awatif Alrasheeday, Basma Salameh, Eddieson Pasay‐an, Shimmaa Mohamed Elsayed, Sameer Abdulmalik Alkubati, Talal Ali Hussein Alqalah, Wesam Taher Almagharbeh, Layla Alshammari, Anwar Abdulkareem
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Enhancing nursing students’ awareness, attitudes, beliefs, and preparedness toward AI may help improve their health care knowledge and practice. Objective This study aimed to assess nursing students’ attitudes, perceptions, self-efficacy, barriers, and anxiety, which influence their readiness to adopt AI in nursing practice. Methods This study used a cross-sectional, correlational design. Data were collected from 307 nursing internship students using an 8-part, self-administered questionnaire. Results Increased self-efficacy with computers was correlated with decreased barriers to accessing AI technology, lower computer anxiety scale scores ( r =−0.27, P <.001 and r =−0.57, P <.001, respectively), and higher perceptions of using AI ( r =0.27, P <.001). Meanwhile, nursing students’ readiness to adopt AI in nursing practice was negatively associated with barriers to accessing AI technology ( r =−0.20, P <.001) and positively associated with attitudes toward and perceptions of using AI ( r =0.32, P <.001 and r =0.14, P =.01, respectively). Increased barriers to accessing AI technology were associated with negative attitudes toward AI and nursing students’ perceptions of using AI ( r =−0.34, P <.001 and r =−0.39, P <.001, respectively). A multilayer neural network model identified barriers (relative importance=0.27), attitudes (relative importance=0.16), and perceptions (relative importance=0.15) as the most significant predictors, while self-efficacy (relative importance=0.11) and anxiety (relative importance=0.07) showed smaller contributions, despite nonsignificant bivariate associations with nursing students’ AI readiness. The model demonstrated strong predictive performance, achieving a low relative error of 0.62 in the training set. The stability and generalization ability of the model were supported by the training and testing set results, which yielded a training sum of squares error of 65.93 and a testing sum of squares error of 35.49, showing no signs of overfitting. Conclusions Several contributing factors influenced nursing students’ readiness to embrace AI, with barriers, attitudes, and perceptions emerging as the most consistent, whereas self-efficacy and anxiety may play indirect roles. To improve the adoption of AI among nursing students, such factors should be dealt with in such educational programs; an interrelated adoption of AI in nursing practice is expounded as a more favorable environment.

JMIR NursingVol. 9
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.