Gatekeeping Mental Health Care: A Critical Analysis of mhGAP-HIG Implementation in Cameroon’s Anglophone Crisis Through an Anti-Oppressive Lens

PURPOSE: The Anglophone crisis in Cameroon (2016-2026) has created a severe mental health treatment gap, yet the implementation of evidence-based interventions like the WHO's mhGAP-HIG remains poorly documented. This paper critically analyzes mhGAP-HIG implementation in Cameroon through an anti-oppressive practice (AOP) lens, examining how structural barriers, power dynamics, and systemic exclusion shape access to mental health training and services. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Drawing on a scoping review of peer-reviewed literature (2016-2025), a document analysis of publicly available organizational reports (CBCHS, UNFPA, Action Against Hunger, WHO), and AOP frameworks, we conducted a critical thematic analysis of barriers to mhGAP-HIG implementation in Cameroon's Northwest and Southwest regions. RESULTS: The analysis identifies four mechanisms of structural exclusion: opaque training access privileging INGO staff; linguistic and cultural barriers marginalizing Anglophone populations; infrastructure collapse disrupting service delivery; and political denial restricting humanitarian access. Document analysis revealed 92 clinicians and 20 stakeholders trained, but trainings are geographically concentrated with no public registry. These mechanisms constitute structural violence perpetuating the treatment gap. DISCUSSION: We propose an AOP-informed framework with five principles: naming structural violence, centering marginalized voices, decentralizing power, ensuring cultural and linguistic safety, and addressing daily stressors. For each, we specify practice strategies, including accessible training pathways, English/Pidgin materials, community supervision, and advocacy. CONCLUSION: mhGAP-HIG can resist the state's abandonment of Anglophone populations, but only if implemented through an explicit anti-oppressive lens that names oppression, centers marginalized communities, and addresses structural determinants of distress.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work
Published
2026-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/26408066.2026.2716789
Primary Topic
Migration, Health and Trauma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gatekeeping Mental Health Care: A Critical Analysis of mhGAP-HIG Implementation in Cameroon’s Anglophone Crisis Through an Anti-Oppressive Lens

Yekpu Eleen Ndze
Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work
Migration, Health and Trauma
article

Gatekeeping Mental Health Care: A Critical Analysis of mhGAP-HIG Implementation in Cameroon’s Anglophone Crisis Through an Anti-Oppressive Lens

Yekpu Eleen Ndze
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Anglophone crisis in Cameroon (2016-2026) has created a severe mental health treatment gap, yet the implementation of evidence-based interventions like the WHO's mhGAP-HIG remains poorly documented. This paper critically analyzes mhGAP-HIG implementation in Cameroon through an anti-oppressive practice (AOP) lens, examining how structural barriers, power dynamics, and systemic exclusion shape access to mental health training and services. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Drawing on a scoping review of peer-reviewed literature (2016-2025), a document analysis of publicly available organizational reports (CBCHS, UNFPA, Action Against Hunger, WHO), and AOP frameworks, we conducted a critical thematic analysis of barriers to mhGAP-HIG implementation in Cameroon's Northwest and Southwest regions. RESULTS: The analysis identifies four mechanisms of structural exclusion: opaque training access privileging INGO staff; linguistic and cultural barriers marginalizing Anglophone populations; infrastructure collapse disrupting service delivery; and political denial restricting humanitarian access. Document analysis revealed 92 clinicians and 20 stakeholders trained, but trainings are geographically concentrated with no public registry. These mechanisms constitute structural violence perpetuating the treatment gap. DISCUSSION: We propose an AOP-informed framework with five principles: naming structural violence, centering marginalized voices, decentralizing power, ensuring cultural and linguistic safety, and addressing daily stressors. For each, we specify practice strategies, including accessible training pathways, English/Pidgin materials, community supervision, and advocacy. CONCLUSION: mhGAP-HIG can resist the state's abandonment of Anglophone populations, but only if implemented through an explicit anti-oppressive lens that names oppression, centers marginalized communities, and addresses structural determinants of distress.

Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work
University of Bamenda (CM)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Migration, Health and Trauma
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.