The Transformation of the Court and the Sino-Japanese War

This paper examines the personnel reorganization within the Japanese imperial court that occurred amid the political upheaval of the mid-1930s—namely, the resignation of Lord Keeper of the Privy Seal Makino Nobuaki and the February 26 Incident. Furthermore, its impact on the decision-making structure during the early stages of the Second Sino-Japanese War is analyzed. Centered on Lord Keeper Yuasa Kurahei, this new court leadership that emerged after Makino’s departure exhibited a markedly diminished grip on the political situation, revealing a serious functional vacuum. This leadership adopted a passive stance during the collapse of Ugaki Kazushige’s attempt to form a cabinet. Moreover, despite the North China Separation Movement and the outbreak of the Sino-Japanese War, it failed to adequately check or restrain the unilateral assertiveness of the military, thereby exposing the limits of its capacity for political mediation. In contrast, Emperor Hirohito emerged as an active agent of counsel and decision-making, directly intervening in pressing matters of state. The Emperor personally corrected errors of political judgment made by the Lord Keeper of the Privy Seal so as to forestall controversy over interference in the prerogative of supreme command. He took the initiative—for instance, by directly instructing that the operational outlook of the Army and Navy General Staffs be shared with Prime Minister Konoe—in an effort to mitigate the chronic structural defect of the Meiji constitutional order: the disjunction between state administration and the supreme command. Likewise, immediately following the Marco Polo Bridge Incident, he sought to pursue peace negotiations because of possible Soviet military intervention. Nevertheless, he was unable to prevent the full-scale, protracted escalation of the Sino-Japanese War despite his efforts at policy coordination through the convening of the Imperial Conference in January 1938.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Center for Japanese Studies Chung-ang University
Published
2026-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20404/jscau.2026.08.65.99
Primary Topic
International Law and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Transformation of the Court and the Sino-Japanese War

Bong-sik Kim
Center for Japanese Studies Chung-ang University
International Law and Human Rights
article

The Transformation of the Court and the Sino-Japanese War

Bong-sik Kim
article en

Abstract

This paper examines the personnel reorganization within the Japanese imperial court that occurred amid the political upheaval of the mid-1930s—namely, the resignation of Lord Keeper of the Privy Seal Makino Nobuaki and the February 26 Incident. Furthermore, its impact on the decision-making structure during the early stages of the Second Sino-Japanese War is analyzed. Centered on Lord Keeper Yuasa Kurahei, this new court leadership that emerged after Makino’s departure exhibited a markedly diminished grip on the political situation, revealing a serious functional vacuum. This leadership adopted a passive stance during the collapse of Ugaki Kazushige’s attempt to form a cabinet. Moreover, despite the North China Separation Movement and the outbreak of the Sino-Japanese War, it failed to adequately check or restrain the unilateral assertiveness of the military, thereby exposing the limits of its capacity for political mediation. In contrast, Emperor Hirohito emerged as an active agent of counsel and decision-making, directly intervening in pressing matters of state. The Emperor personally corrected errors of political judgment made by the Lord Keeper of the Privy Seal so as to forestall controversy over interference in the prerogative of supreme command. He took the initiative—for instance, by directly instructing that the operational outlook of the Army and Navy General Staffs be shared with Prime Minister Konoe—in an effort to mitigate the chronic structural defect of the Meiji constitutional order: the disjunction between state administration and the supreme command. Likewise, immediately following the Marco Polo Bridge Incident, he sought to pursue peace negotiations because of possible Soviet military intervention. Nevertheless, he was unable to prevent the full-scale, protracted escalation of the Sino-Japanese War despite his efforts at policy coordination through the convening of the Imperial Conference in January 1938.

Center for Japanese Studies Chung-ang UniversityVol. 65
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
International Law and Human Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.