Differential Rates of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Modification in C-MIC and Control Patients: Results from the C-MIC II Trial

Abstract Background In the C-MIC II trial, C-MIC therapy improved outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). We evaluated whether differences in background HF medication adjustments influenced the observed benefits. Methods Ambulatory patients with chronic non-ischemic HFrEF receiving guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) were enrolled. The primary outcome was change in GDMT and diuretic intensity over 6 months. Treatment effects on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary Score (KCCQ-OSS), and 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) were assessed by baseline sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) use for consistency. Results Among 65 patients, 25 (39%) had GDMT adjustments (C-MIC device: 44%; control 33%; p= 0.390). GDMT intensity increased in controls (Δ +0.36) but decreased (Δ -0.16; p= 0.100) in C-MIC group. Diuretic intensity decreased in C-MIC group (Δ -0.10) but increased in controls (Δ +0.12; p= 0.200). When stratified by baseline SGLT2i use, C-MIC therapy induced consistent improvements in LVEF (SGLT2i: +6% [95% CI 3–9; p<0.001] vs. without SGLT2i: +4% [95% CI 2–7; p=0.003]), KCCQ-OSS (SGLT2i: +42 points [95% CI 26–58; p<0.001] vs. without SGLT2i: +40 [95% CI 28–51; p<0.001]) and 6MWD (SGLT2i: +150 meters [95% CI 88–212; p<0.001] vs. without SGLT2i: +141 meters (95% CI 63–219; p<0.001]). Conclusion Medication intensity decreased in C-MIC–treated patients but increased in controls, driven primarily by escalation of diuretics, likely reflecting worsening HF. Consistent improvements in LVEF, 6MWD and KCCQ-OSS across SGLT2i subgroups suggest that the observed benefits are independent of background pharmacologic intensification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ESC Heart Failure
Published
2026-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eschf/xvag220
Primary Topic
Diabetes Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differential Rates of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Modification in C-MIC and Control Patients: Results from the C-MIC II Trial

Velibor Ristić, Dragana Kosevic, Nermir Granov, F. Kallel et al.
ESC Heart Failure
Diabetes Treatment and Management
article

Differential Rates of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Modification in C-MIC and Control Patients: Results from the C-MIC II Trial

Velibor Ristić, Dragana Kosevic, Nermir Granov, F. Kallel, Annette Holtdirk, Igor Rudež, Sasko Jovev, Tanja Popov, Marija Zdravkovic, Tamara Kovacevic-Preradovic, Javed Butler, Stefan D Anker, Miodrag Peric, J Eduardo Rame, Petar Vukovic, Marat Fudim
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background In the C-MIC II trial, C-MIC therapy improved outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). We evaluated whether differences in background HF medication adjustments influenced the observed benefits. Methods Ambulatory patients with chronic non-ischemic HFrEF receiving guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) were enrolled. The primary outcome was change in GDMT and diuretic intensity over 6 months. Treatment effects on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary Score (KCCQ-OSS), and 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) were assessed by baseline sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) use for consistency. Results Among 65 patients, 25 (39%) had GDMT adjustments (C-MIC device: 44%; control 33%; p= 0.390). GDMT intensity increased in controls (Δ +0.36) but decreased (Δ -0.16; p= 0.100) in C-MIC group. Diuretic intensity decreased in C-MIC group (Δ -0.10) but increased in controls (Δ +0.12; p= 0.200). When stratified by baseline SGLT2i use, C-MIC therapy induced consistent improvements in LVEF (SGLT2i: +6% [95% CI 3–9; p<0.001] vs. without SGLT2i: +4% [95% CI 2–7; p=0.003]), KCCQ-OSS (SGLT2i: +42 points [95% CI 26–58; p<0.001] vs. without SGLT2i: +40 [95% CI 28–51; p<0.001]) and 6MWD (SGLT2i: +150 meters [95% CI 88–212; p<0.001] vs. without SGLT2i: +141 meters (95% CI 63–219; p<0.001]). Conclusion Medication intensity decreased in C-MIC–treated patients but increased in controls, driven primarily by escalation of diuretics, likely reflecting worsening HF. Consistent improvements in LVEF, 6MWD and KCCQ-OSS across SGLT2i subgroups suggest that the observed benefits are independent of background pharmacologic intensification.

ESC Heart Failure
University of Sarajevo (BA), Thomas Jefferson University (US), Duke University (US), University of Banja Luka (BA), University Hospital Dubrava (HR), University of Mississippi Medical Center (US), Clinical Research Institute (US), Grade Medical (Czechia) (CZ), University Clinic of Traumatology (AT), Baylor Medical Center at Garland (US), Clinical Center University of Sarajevo (BA), Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases of Vojvodina (RS), Institute of Public Health of Vojvodina (RS), Cardiovascular Center Frankfurt (DE), German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DE), Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE), PHI University Psychiatric Clinic - Skopje (MK), University Hospital Medical Center Bezanijska kosa (RS), Berlin Heart (Germany) (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Diabetes Treatment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.