Reproducibility of T2 relaxation time mapping in a phantom and human knee articular cartilage

Abstract Objective To quantify the reproducibility of knee articular cartilage T2 across a wide range of MR systems. Materials and methods The reproducibility of T2 relaxation time mapping was assessed by measuring the knee of a volunteer (n 1.5 T = 22, n 3T = 13) and a System Standard 130 phantom (n 1.5 T = 19, n 3T = 12) in 38 different clinical MRI scanners at 16 imaging sites. Root-mean-square coefficient of variation (CV RMS ) was used to quantify the reproducibility of T2 at the selected knee cartilage regions of interest (ROI) and the phantom T2 array vials. Results Low-to-moderate inter-scanner variation for the knee ROIs, CV = 2.2% to 22.8%, CV RMS,1.5 T = 9.3%, CV RMS,3 T = 11.0%, was observed. The phantom measurements showed low inter-scanner variation (CV RMS, 1.5 T = 4.7%, CV RMS, 3 T = 2.4%) on the typical cartilage T2 range. Discussion Reproducibility of quantitative T2 can vary between healthcare facilities and scanners but also between the cartilage compartments. The variation is sufficiently small to consider T2 mapping reproducible. Phantom measurements support this result.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics Biology and Medicine
Published
2026-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-026-01406-y
Primary Topic
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reproducibility of T2 relaxation time mapping in a phantom and human knee articular cartilage

Antti Paajanen, Teija Sainio, Eveliina Lammentausta, Mikko J. Nissi et al.
Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics Biology and Medicine
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
article

Reproducibility of T2 relaxation time mapping in a phantom and human knee articular cartilage

Antti Paajanen, Teija Sainio, Eveliina Lammentausta, Mikko J. Nissi, Simo Ojanen, Amir Esrafilian, Jari Rautiainen, Victor Casula, Petri Kaurola, Mimmi K. Liukkonen, Henri Leskinen, Ville Kantola, Nea Pulkkinen, Jarkko Iivarinen, Jari Heikkinen
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective To quantify the reproducibility of knee articular cartilage T2 across a wide range of MR systems. Materials and methods The reproducibility of T2 relaxation time mapping was assessed by measuring the knee of a volunteer (n 1.5 T = 22, n 3T = 13) and a System Standard 130 phantom (n 1.5 T = 19, n 3T = 12) in 38 different clinical MRI scanners at 16 imaging sites. Root-mean-square coefficient of variation (CV RMS ) was used to quantify the reproducibility of T2 at the selected knee cartilage regions of interest (ROI) and the phantom T2 array vials. Results Low-to-moderate inter-scanner variation for the knee ROIs, CV = 2.2% to 22.8%, CV RMS,1.5 T = 9.3%, CV RMS,3 T = 11.0%, was observed. The phantom measurements showed low inter-scanner variation (CV RMS, 1.5 T = 4.7%, CV RMS, 3 T = 2.4%) on the typical cartilage T2 range. Discussion Reproducibility of quantitative T2 can vary between healthcare facilities and scanners but also between the cartilage compartments. The variation is sufficiently small to consider T2 mapping reproducible. Phantom measurements support this result.

Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics Biology and Medicine
University of Turku (FI), University of Eastern Finland (FI), Oulu University Hospital (FI), Turku University Hospital (FI), Kajaani University of Applied Sciences (FI), Kuopio University Hospital (FI), Lapland Central Hospital (FI), Turku PET Centre (FI), Central Finland Health Care District (FI), South Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences (FI), Stanford University (US), University of Oulu (FI)
Itä-Suomen Yliopisto, European Commission, Academy of Finland, Aalto-Yliopisto, Kuopion Yliopistollinen Sairaala, Vaasan Keskussairaala, Tays, Turun Yliopistollinen Keskussairaala, Seinäjoen Keskussairaala, Etelä-Savon Rahasto, Luonnontieteiden ja Tekniikan Tutkimuksen Toimikunta, HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.