Boundaries Between Freedom of Expression and Hate Speech: The Case of Struggle Songs Current Perspectives From the Global South

This discussion article addresses the historical, political and social context of struggle songs in South Africa and the circumstances in which such songs should be considered prohibited hate speech. The analysis is framed around the decision in AfriForum v Malema , in which the Supreme Court of Appeal held that the singing of the Dubul’ ibhunu ( Kill the boer ) song on the occasions in issue did not amount to hate speech. The article approaches the problem from three main perspectives, namely law, politics and music, and to a lesser extent, psychology. It concludes that while courts are required to interpret struggle songs with reference to their performative and figurative meaning and their function, an objective and balanced approach must also be adopted. Regard must be had to the nature of the occasion when a particular song is sung, the role-players involved, the power dynamics at play and the potential for harm against the group targeted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
South African Journal of Psychology
Published
2026-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00812463261475626
Primary Topic
Legal Issues in South Africa
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Boundaries Between Freedom of Expression and Hate Speech: The Case of Struggle Songs Current Perspectives From the Global South

Ben Winks, Joanna Botha, Liz Gunner, Sisanda Nkoala
South African Journal of Psychology
Legal Issues in South Africa
article

Boundaries Between Freedom of Expression and Hate Speech: The Case of Struggle Songs Current Perspectives From the Global South

Ben Winks, Joanna Botha, Liz Gunner, Sisanda Nkoala
article en

Abstract

This discussion article addresses the historical, political and social context of struggle songs in South Africa and the circumstances in which such songs should be considered prohibited hate speech. The analysis is framed around the decision in AfriForum v Malema , in which the Supreme Court of Appeal held that the singing of the Dubul’ ibhunu ( Kill the boer ) song on the occasions in issue did not amount to hate speech. The article approaches the problem from three main perspectives, namely law, politics and music, and to a lesser extent, psychology. It concludes that while courts are required to interpret struggle songs with reference to their performative and figurative meaning and their function, an objective and balanced approach must also be adopted. Regard must be had to the nature of the occasion when a particular song is sung, the role-players involved, the power dynamics at play and the potential for harm against the group targeted.

South African Journal of Psychology
University of Johannesburg (ZA), South African Association of Women Graduates (ZA), University of the Western Cape (ZA), Nelson Mandela University (ZA)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Legal Issues in South Africa
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.