“As soon as it’s trying to be persuasive, my skepticism kicks in”: A qualitative study to co-design vaccine communication strategies with vaccine hesitant adults in Canada

Vaccine hesitancy continues to impede vaccine uptake in Canada. Few interventions directly engage hesitant adults in co-designing communication materials. This study aimed to co-develop and evaluate digital vaccine communication messages with hesitant adults in Canada to improve message relevance and trustworthiness. Using a qualitatively driven design with an exploratory user-test survey, we conducted two rounds of 4 focus groups (n = 31) with self-identified vaccine hesitant adults across Canada to co-design and refine three digital interventions (a video, an infographic, and a social media graphic). Insights from the focus groups informed a brief survey that assessed acceptability, perceived effectiveness, relevance and perceived influence on subsequent behaviors. Participants represented Fence-sitters and Cautious Acceptors across ages, genders, and regions in Canada. Focus groups generated three overarching themes reflecting adult health communication preferences: (1) confidence fostered through credible, consistent and transparent sources, (2) readable, relatable and visually engaging messaging, and (3) positive, encouraging messaging that fosters emotional connection rather than fear-driven persuasion. These principles shaped the three final co-designed messages. Survey responses suggested high acceptability of the infographic (90%) and video (90%). Across formats, expert-delivered content, concise visuals, and transparent data were the most persuasive features. Mixed reactions to fear-based elements informed a deliberate choice to avoid using coercive or fear-based framing, resulting in a more encouraging final tone. This study moves beyond identifying communication gaps by presenting concrete, co-created strategies for building trust with vaccine hesitant adults. Future research should test these strategies at scale to assess their impact on vaccine confidence and uptake.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
Published
2026-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2026.2712044
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“As soon as it’s trying to be persuasive, my skepticism kicks in”: A qualitative study to co-design vaccine communication strategies with vaccine hesitant adults in Canada

Stephana J. Moss, Jeanna Parsons Leigh, Sara J. Mizen, Andrea Soo et al.
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
article

“As soon as it’s trying to be persuasive, my skepticism kicks in”: A qualitative study to co-design vaccine communication strategies with vaccine hesitant adults in Canada

Stephana J. Moss, Jeanna Parsons Leigh, Sara J. Mizen, Andrea Soo, Josh Ng Kamstra, Cristina Zuniga Chacon, Sharon E. Straus, Donna M. Halperin, Jade MacDonald, Kirsten M. Fiest, Sofia B. Ahmed, Terra Manca, Scott A. Halperin, Ève Dubé, Shannon E. MacDonald, Henry T. Stelfox
article en

Abstract

Vaccine hesitancy continues to impede vaccine uptake in Canada. Few interventions directly engage hesitant adults in co-designing communication materials. This study aimed to co-develop and evaluate digital vaccine communication messages with hesitant adults in Canada to improve message relevance and trustworthiness. Using a qualitatively driven design with an exploratory user-test survey, we conducted two rounds of 4 focus groups (n = 31) with self-identified vaccine hesitant adults across Canada to co-design and refine three digital interventions (a video, an infographic, and a social media graphic). Insights from the focus groups informed a brief survey that assessed acceptability, perceived effectiveness, relevance and perceived influence on subsequent behaviors. Participants represented Fence-sitters and Cautious Acceptors across ages, genders, and regions in Canada. Focus groups generated three overarching themes reflecting adult health communication preferences: (1) confidence fostered through credible, consistent and transparent sources, (2) readable, relatable and visually engaging messaging, and (3) positive, encouraging messaging that fosters emotional connection rather than fear-driven persuasion. These principles shaped the three final co-designed messages. Survey responses suggested high acceptability of the infographic (90%) and video (90%). Across formats, expert-delivered content, concise visuals, and transparent data were the most persuasive features. Mixed reactions to fear-based elements informed a deliberate choice to avoid using coercive or fear-based framing, resulting in a more encouraging final tone. This study moves beyond identifying communication gaps by presenting concrete, co-created strategies for building trust with vaccine hesitant adults. Future research should test these strategies at scale to assess their impact on vaccine confidence and uptake.

Human Vaccines & ImmunotherapeuticsVol. 22(1)
Dalhousie University (CA), Harvard University (US), University of Alberta (CA), University of Calgary (CA), University of Toronto (CA), St. Francis Xavier University (CA), Canadian Armed Forces (CA), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Shared Services Canada (CA), Université Laval (CA), Unity Health Toronto, Athabasca University (CA)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.