“As soon as it’s trying to be persuasive, my skepticism kicks in”: A qualitative study to co-design vaccine communication strategies with vaccine hesitant adults in Canada
Vaccine hesitancy continues to impede vaccine uptake in Canada. Few interventions directly engage hesitant adults in co-designing communication materials. This study aimed to co-develop and evaluate digital vaccine communication messages with hesitant adults in Canada to improve message relevance and trustworthiness. Using a qualitatively driven design with an exploratory user-test survey, we conducted two rounds of 4 focus groups (n = 31) with self-identified vaccine hesitant adults across Canada to co-design and refine three digital interventions (a video, an infographic, and a social media graphic). Insights from the focus groups informed a brief survey that assessed acceptability, perceived effectiveness, relevance and perceived influence on subsequent behaviors. Participants represented Fence-sitters and Cautious Acceptors across ages, genders, and regions in Canada. Focus groups generated three overarching themes reflecting adult health communication preferences: (1) confidence fostered through credible, consistent and transparent sources, (2) readable, relatable and visually engaging messaging, and (3) positive, encouraging messaging that fosters emotional connection rather than fear-driven persuasion. These principles shaped the three final co-designed messages. Survey responses suggested high acceptability of the infographic (90%) and video (90%). Across formats, expert-delivered content, concise visuals, and transparent data were the most persuasive features. Mixed reactions to fear-based elements informed a deliberate choice to avoid using coercive or fear-based framing, resulting in a more encouraging final tone. This study moves beyond identifying communication gaps by presenting concrete, co-created strategies for building trust with vaccine hesitant adults. Future research should test these strategies at scale to assess their impact on vaccine confidence and uptake.
Authors
- Stephana J. Moss (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1157-884X)
- Jeanna Parsons Leigh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8408-674X)
- Sara J. Mizen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5429-7645)
- Andrea Soo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5373-7239)
- Josh Ng Kamstra
- Cristina Zuniga Chacon
- Sharon E. Straus
- Donna M. Halperin
- Jade MacDonald
- Kirsten M. Fiest
- Sofia B. Ahmed (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3000-2229)
- Terra Manca
- Scott A. Halperin
- Ève Dubé
- Shannon E. MacDonald
- Henry T. Stelfox
Institutions
- Dalhousie University (CA)
- Harvard University (US)
- University of Alberta (CA)
- University of Calgary (CA)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- St. Francis Xavier University (CA)
- Canadian Armed Forces (CA)
- Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
- Shared Services Canada (CA)
- Université Laval (CA)
- Unity Health Toronto
- Athabasca University (CA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
- Published
- 2026-08-18
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2026.2712044
- Primary Topic
- Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00