Evaluation of foundational mathematics support for health sciences students

Abstract Background University entrants have increasingly diverse academic backgrounds, creating a need for foundational mathematics support in health sciences programs. In medical technology and clinical engineering education, mathematical competence underpins subjects such as statistics, physics, and engineering, as well as clinically relevant quantitative tasks. This study evaluated a mathematics remedial education program for first-year undergraduate students in the Department of Medical Technology and Clinical Engineering and examined unit-specific learning gains. Methods Participants were first-year students in two academic years (2024: $$n = 28$$ ; 2025: $$n = 30$$ ). Pre- and post-tests covering fundamental mathematical topics were administered before and after the program. Differences in percentage scores were analyzed using paired t-tests, and effect sizes were calculated using Cohen’s d . Results Overall scores improved significantly in both academic years. In the pooled sample, the mean score increased from $$28.00 \pm 11.11$$ to $$61.36 \pm 18.89$$ (mean difference: 33.36 points, 95% CI: 29.06–37.66; $$p < 0.001$$ ; Cohen’s d = 2.04). Statistically significant improvements were observed in 10 of the 11 mathematical units, although the magnitude of improvement varied by unit. Conclusions Early foundational mathematics support was associated with improved test performance and may contribute to students’ academic readiness for quantitatively demanding health science coursework. Unit-specific evaluation may help identify areas requiring additional instructional support and inform the design of transition-stage learning support in health science education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Education
Published
2026-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-10151-8
Primary Topic
Mathematics Education and Programs
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of foundational mathematics support for health sciences students

Yumiko Abe, Hirokazu Murakami, Yusuke Ono, Yasumasa Totsuka
BMC Medical Education
Mathematics Education and Programs
article

Evaluation of foundational mathematics support for health sciences students

Yumiko Abe, Hirokazu Murakami, Yusuke Ono, Yasumasa Totsuka
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background University entrants have increasingly diverse academic backgrounds, creating a need for foundational mathematics support in health sciences programs. In medical technology and clinical engineering education, mathematical competence underpins subjects such as statistics, physics, and engineering, as well as clinically relevant quantitative tasks. This study evaluated a mathematics remedial education program for first-year undergraduate students in the Department of Medical Technology and Clinical Engineering and examined unit-specific learning gains. Methods Participants were first-year students in two academic years (2024: $$n = 28$$ ; 2025: $$n = 30$$ ). Pre- and post-tests covering fundamental mathematical topics were administered before and after the program. Differences in percentage scores were analyzed using paired t-tests, and effect sizes were calculated using Cohen’s d . Results Overall scores improved significantly in both academic years. In the pooled sample, the mean score increased from $$28.00 \pm 11.11$$ to $$61.36 \pm 18.89$$ (mean difference: 33.36 points, 95% CI: 29.06–37.66; $$p < 0.001$$ ; Cohen’s d = 2.04). Statistically significant improvements were observed in 10 of the 11 mathematical units, although the magnitude of improvement varied by unit. Conclusions Early foundational mathematics support was associated with improved test performance and may contribute to students’ academic readiness for quantitatively demanding health science coursework. Unit-specific evaluation may help identify areas requiring additional instructional support and inform the design of transition-stage learning support in health science education.

BMC Medical Education
Gunma University of Health and Welfare (JP)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Mathematics Education and Programs
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.