Cefazolin Versus Flucloxacillin for Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bone and Joint Infections: A Retrospective Single-Center Comparative Study of Effectiveness and Renal Safety of Intravenous Monotherapy

Background/Objectives: In methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bacteremia, randomized evidence indicates comparable efficacy of cefazolin and antistaphylococcal penicillins with less nephrotoxicity; whether this extends to bone and joint infection (BJI) is unknown. We compared both agents in MSSA BJI. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all adults at a single center with culture-confirmed, monomicrobial MSSA BJI treated with inpatient intravenous cefazolin or flucloxacillin monotherapy (January 2022–January 2025)—a selected population excluding rifampicin-based combination therapy, outpatient parenteral therapy, polymicrobial infection, and concurrent bacteremia/endocarditis. Endpoints, a priori exploratory, comprised effectiveness (mortality; clinical success) and renal safety (peri-treatment acute kidney injury [AKI]); the AKI comparison was additionally adjusted for confounders. Results: Among 110 patients (64 cefazolin, 46 flucloxacillin), baseline characteristics were comparable except for more frequent nephrotoxic co-medication with cefazolin (56.2% vs. 26.1%; p = 0.002). No statistically significant differences in effectiveness were detected: 30-day clinical success was 89.1% versus 80.4% (ARD 8.6 percentage points, 95% CI −4.7 to +23.3) and one-year clinical success 79.7% versus 65.2% (ARD 14.5, 95% CI −2.2 to +31.0); these imprecise estimates are compatible with effects ranging from no difference to a clinically relevant benefit of cefazolin. Peri-treatment AKI occurred in 19.0% versus 30.4% (ARD 11.4, 95% CI −4.7 to +27.7; adjusted odds ratio 2.27, 95% CI 0.87–5.91); the difference was confined to stage 1. Conclusions: In this selected inpatient monotherapy cohort, cefazolin was associated with numerically fewer AKI events, without statistically significant differences in any comparison. These exploratory findings support cefazolin as a rational targeted option for MSSA BJI, pending prospective confirmation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Antibiotics
Published
2026-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics15080798
Primary Topic
Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cefazolin Versus Flucloxacillin for Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bone and Joint Infections: A Retrospective Single-Center Comparative Study of Effectiveness and Renal Safety of Intravenous Monotherapy

Natalia Gutteck, Alexander Zeh, Juliane Beschauner, Felix Werneburg et al.
Antibiotics
Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
article

Cefazolin Versus Flucloxacillin for Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bone and Joint Infections: A Retrospective Single-Center Comparative Study of Effectiveness and Renal Safety of Intravenous Monotherapy

Natalia Gutteck, Alexander Zeh, Juliane Beschauner, Felix Werneburg, Karl-Stefan Delank, Laura Isabell Werneburg
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: In methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bacteremia, randomized evidence indicates comparable efficacy of cefazolin and antistaphylococcal penicillins with less nephrotoxicity; whether this extends to bone and joint infection (BJI) is unknown. We compared both agents in MSSA BJI. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all adults at a single center with culture-confirmed, monomicrobial MSSA BJI treated with inpatient intravenous cefazolin or flucloxacillin monotherapy (January 2022–January 2025)—a selected population excluding rifampicin-based combination therapy, outpatient parenteral therapy, polymicrobial infection, and concurrent bacteremia/endocarditis. Endpoints, a priori exploratory, comprised effectiveness (mortality; clinical success) and renal safety (peri-treatment acute kidney injury [AKI]); the AKI comparison was additionally adjusted for confounders. Results: Among 110 patients (64 cefazolin, 46 flucloxacillin), baseline characteristics were comparable except for more frequent nephrotoxic co-medication with cefazolin (56.2% vs. 26.1%; p = 0.002). No statistically significant differences in effectiveness were detected: 30-day clinical success was 89.1% versus 80.4% (ARD 8.6 percentage points, 95% CI −4.7 to +23.3) and one-year clinical success 79.7% versus 65.2% (ARD 14.5, 95% CI −2.2 to +31.0); these imprecise estimates are compatible with effects ranging from no difference to a clinically relevant benefit of cefazolin. Peri-treatment AKI occurred in 19.0% versus 30.4% (ARD 11.4, 95% CI −4.7 to +27.7; adjusted odds ratio 2.27, 95% CI 0.87–5.91); the difference was confined to stage 1. Conclusions: In this selected inpatient monotherapy cohort, cefazolin was associated with numerically fewer AKI events, without statistically significant differences in any comparison. These exploratory findings support cefazolin as a rational targeted option for MSSA BJI, pending prospective confirmation.

AntibioticsVol. 15(8)
Luther University (KR), Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.