Evaluating Bayesian Variable Selection Approaches for Nonlinear Random Effects Models

Longitudinal data modeling attracts special interest from researchers and practitioners because of its capacity to help understand individual and mean trends of growth and development over time. One feature of longitudinal design is the collection of extensive information on participants to help explain the underlying growth process. However, selecting which covariates or independent variables (i.e., predictors) to include in a statistical model is challenging especially with the goals of avoiding both overfitting and underfitting. The present study demonstrates and compares multiple Bayesian variable selection methods for the selection of covariates to explain longitudinal growth processes, including both shrinkage methods (e.g., horseshoe) and stochastic variable search method (e.g., spike-and-slab priors and their extension to a Normal Mixture of Inverse Gammas), via an extensive Monte Carlo simulation study using a piecewise random effects model with unknown change point as an example. Our goal is to provide recommendations for researchers and practitioners about the advantages and limitations of Bayesian variable selection methods for variable selection in longitudinal studies, including model convergence and parameter estimation precision and accuracy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Multivariate Behavioral Research
Published
2026-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2026.2716743
Primary Topic
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Bayesian Variable Selection Approaches for Nonlinear Random Effects Models

Nidhi Kohli, Eric F. Lock, Yue Zhao
Multivariate Behavioral Research
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
article

Evaluating Bayesian Variable Selection Approaches for Nonlinear Random Effects Models

Nidhi Kohli, Eric F. Lock, Yue Zhao
article en

Abstract

Longitudinal data modeling attracts special interest from researchers and practitioners because of its capacity to help understand individual and mean trends of growth and development over time. One feature of longitudinal design is the collection of extensive information on participants to help explain the underlying growth process. However, selecting which covariates or independent variables (i.e., predictors) to include in a statistical model is challenging especially with the goals of avoiding both overfitting and underfitting. The present study demonstrates and compares multiple Bayesian variable selection methods for the selection of covariates to explain longitudinal growth processes, including both shrinkage methods (e.g., horseshoe) and stochastic variable search method (e.g., spike-and-slab priors and their extension to a Normal Mixture of Inverse Gammas), via an extensive Monte Carlo simulation study using a piecewise random effects model with unknown change point as an example. Our goal is to provide recommendations for researchers and practitioners about the advantages and limitations of Bayesian variable selection methods for variable selection in longitudinal studies, including model convergence and parameter estimation precision and accuracy.

Multivariate Behavioral Research
University of Minnesota (US), Minnesota Department of Education (US), Department of Health (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.