Short- and long-term influences on voting: the case of the 2025 Australian election

The 2025 Australian federal election, although widely expected to result in a hung parliament, was a resounding win for the Australian Labor Party. What explained this result? Was the election result driven by long-term shifts in Australian electoral behaviour, by short-term campaign dynamics, or by a combination of the two? This article analyses the 2025 Australian Election Study data to evaluate explanations for the election result. The analyses show how a combination of long-term and short-term factors shaped the decisive win for Labor and the historic loss for the Liberal-National Coalition. The Coalition vote has gradually eroded through generational change and the emergence of a modern gender gap in voting. Against the background of these long-term social changes, short-term factors during the campaign overwhelmingly favoured Labor, including leader evaluations and the policy issues. The results have implications for debates about the possible realignment of the Australian party system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Journal of Political Science
Published
2026-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2026.2714948
Primary Topic
Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Short- and long-term influences on voting: the case of the 2025 Australian election

Sarah Cameron, Ian McAllister
Australian Journal of Political Science
Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism
article

Short- and long-term influences on voting: the case of the 2025 Australian election

Sarah Cameron, Ian McAllister
article en

Abstract

The 2025 Australian federal election, although widely expected to result in a hung parliament, was a resounding win for the Australian Labor Party. What explained this result? Was the election result driven by long-term shifts in Australian electoral behaviour, by short-term campaign dynamics, or by a combination of the two? This article analyses the 2025 Australian Election Study data to evaluate explanations for the election result. The analyses show how a combination of long-term and short-term factors shaped the decisive win for Labor and the historic loss for the Liberal-National Coalition. The Coalition vote has gradually eroded through generational change and the emergence of a modern gender gap in voting. Against the background of these long-term social changes, short-term factors during the campaign overwhelmingly favoured Labor, including leader evaluations and the policy issues. The results have implications for debates about the possible realignment of the Australian party system.

Australian Journal of Political Science
Griffith University (AU), Australian National University (AU)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.