Attitudes towards artificial intelligence among students and faculty staff at Kuwait University's Health Science Centre: A cross-sectional study

BackgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into healthcare and health-professions education. While it may improve efficiency, decision support, and learning, it also raises concerns about workforce impacts, safety, privacy, and accountability. Gulf-region evidence on how students and faculty perceive AI across disciplines within a single health science center remains limited.ObjectiveTo assess attitudes toward AI among health-sciences students and faculty and examine demographic factors associated with these attitudes.MethodsA descriptive cross-sectional online survey using convenience sampling was distributed to Health Science Centre (HSC) students and faculty (605 students, 43 faculty). It included demographic variables and two standardized measures, the General Attitudes towards Artificial Intelligence Scale (GAAIS) and the Artificial Intelligence Attitude Scale-4 (AIAS-4). Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha; groups were compared using Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests.ResultsAttitudes were broadly positive in both groups. Faculty scored higher than students on GAAIS (62.0 vs 55.5; p < 0.001) but not AIAS-4 (68.7 vs 63.1; p = 0.094). Among students, males scored higher on GAAIS (61.2 vs 54.9; p < 0.001) and AIAS-4 (71.4 vs 62.2; p = 0.004). AIAS-4 also differed by nationality (Kuwaiti 64.3 vs non-Kuwaiti 56.6; p = 0.005) and major (p < 0.001), with lower-GPA students less positive. In multivariable regression, male gender, Kuwaiti nationality, higher GPA, and discipline were independently associated with AIAS-4; physical-therapy students scored significantly lower than several disciplines.ConclusionsStudents and faculty demonstrate broadly positive attitudes toward AI alongside concerns about safety, surveillance, and workforce displacement. Structured education, practical exposure, and ethics- and governance-oriented teaching may support responsible AI integration in health-professions education and practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Work
Published
2026-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10519815261477732
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Attitudes towards artificial intelligence among students and faculty staff at Kuwait University's Health Science Centre: A cross-sectional study

Musaed Z. Alnaser, Hamad Alhamad, Dalal Almutairi, Ahmad Alenezi et al.
Work
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Attitudes towards artificial intelligence among students and faculty staff at Kuwait University's Health Science Centre: A cross-sectional study

Musaed Z. Alnaser, Hamad Alhamad, Dalal Almutairi, Ahmad Alenezi, Sara AlRasheed, Sara AlHarban, Fatemah AlObaid
article en

Abstract

BackgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into healthcare and health-professions education. While it may improve efficiency, decision support, and learning, it also raises concerns about workforce impacts, safety, privacy, and accountability. Gulf-region evidence on how students and faculty perceive AI across disciplines within a single health science center remains limited.ObjectiveTo assess attitudes toward AI among health-sciences students and faculty and examine demographic factors associated with these attitudes.MethodsA descriptive cross-sectional online survey using convenience sampling was distributed to Health Science Centre (HSC) students and faculty (605 students, 43 faculty). It included demographic variables and two standardized measures, the General Attitudes towards Artificial Intelligence Scale (GAAIS) and the Artificial Intelligence Attitude Scale-4 (AIAS-4). Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha; groups were compared using Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests.ResultsAttitudes were broadly positive in both groups. Faculty scored higher than students on GAAIS (62.0 vs 55.5; p < 0.001) but not AIAS-4 (68.7 vs 63.1; p = 0.094). Among students, males scored higher on GAAIS (61.2 vs 54.9; p < 0.001) and AIAS-4 (71.4 vs 62.2; p = 0.004). AIAS-4 also differed by nationality (Kuwaiti 64.3 vs non-Kuwaiti 56.6; p = 0.005) and major (p < 0.001), with lower-GPA students less positive. In multivariable regression, male gender, Kuwaiti nationality, higher GPA, and discipline were independently associated with AIAS-4; physical-therapy students scored significantly lower than several disciplines.ConclusionsStudents and faculty demonstrate broadly positive attitudes toward AI alongside concerns about safety, surveillance, and workforce displacement. Structured education, practical exposure, and ethics- and governance-oriented teaching may support responsible AI integration in health-professions education and practice.

Work
Kuwait University (KW), Ministry of Health (KW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.