The narrow concept of technology and problems of transport: Contributions of Feenberg’s critical theory of technology to critiques of techno-rational transport planning

Transport planning and policymaking have been criticized for positivism and instrumentalism that ignore many social and political aspects of transport systems. Andrew Feenberg’s critical theory of technology argues that the way technologies are understood has a profound influence on how they are managed in society. Abstracting technological principles from the social contexts of the use of technologies has enabled major technological developments. On the other hand, such an approach risks ignoring many effects of technical systems. This appears to capture well the phenomena diagnosed by critical transport scholarship. While Feenberg’s critical theory of technology addresses the issue in general terms, this article investigates whether the theory could bring new insights for both transport planning and policymaking. Firstly, the article identifies the basis of technical expertise in transport planning as lying in a narrow understanding of technology described by Feenberg. This explains the appeal and persistence of the positivist and instrumentalist approach in transport planning. Secondly, the characterization of technical expertise drawing from Feenberg could be used to complement transport policy studies to understand why certain issues remain unaddressed. Finally, broader concepts of technology, proposed by Feenberg, that include context and values could support a richer understanding of transport in the context of planning and better inclusion of social and environmental concerns in the context of transport policymaking.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urban Studies
Published
2026-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980261469441
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The narrow concept of technology and problems of transport: Contributions of Feenberg’s critical theory of technology to critiques of techno-rational transport planning

Maria Käpyvaara
Urban Studies
Urban Transport and Accessibility
article

The narrow concept of technology and problems of transport: Contributions of Feenberg’s critical theory of technology to critiques of techno-rational transport planning

Maria Käpyvaara
article en

Abstract

Transport planning and policymaking have been criticized for positivism and instrumentalism that ignore many social and political aspects of transport systems. Andrew Feenberg’s critical theory of technology argues that the way technologies are understood has a profound influence on how they are managed in society. Abstracting technological principles from the social contexts of the use of technologies has enabled major technological developments. On the other hand, such an approach risks ignoring many effects of technical systems. This appears to capture well the phenomena diagnosed by critical transport scholarship. While Feenberg’s critical theory of technology addresses the issue in general terms, this article investigates whether the theory could bring new insights for both transport planning and policymaking. Firstly, the article identifies the basis of technical expertise in transport planning as lying in a narrow understanding of technology described by Feenberg. This explains the appeal and persistence of the positivist and instrumentalist approach in transport planning. Secondly, the characterization of technical expertise drawing from Feenberg could be used to complement transport policy studies to understand why certain issues remain unaddressed. Finally, broader concepts of technology, proposed by Feenberg, that include context and values could support a richer understanding of transport in the context of planning and better inclusion of social and environmental concerns in the context of transport policymaking.

Urban Studies
Aalto University (FI)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.