Lung Ultrasound in Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: Diagnostic Tool, Prognostic Marker or Monitoring Strategy?

Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) remains one of the leading chronic respiratory complications of extreme prematurity despite major advances in neonatal intensive care. Current diagnostic definitions are primarily based on respiratory support requirements and provide limited information on the biological heterogeneity and longitudinal evolution of lung injury. Lung ultrasound (LUS) is progressively reshaping the clinical approach to BPD by enabling radiation-free, bedside, and repeatable assessment of peripheral lung abnormalities throughout the neonatal course. This narrative review examines the current role of LUS in BPD, integrating its pathophysiological basis with the available evidence and distinguishing explicitly between its diagnostic, prognostic, monitoring, and treatment-guiding applications, which are supported by markedly different levels of evidence. We discuss how LUS findings reflect the major components of BPD pathophysiology, compare LUS with conventional imaging modalities, and summarize the scanning protocols, semiquantitative scoring systems, examination schedules, and patient populations that have been evaluated to date. We also review the emerging contribution of artificial intelligence to automated image analysis, standardized image acquisition, and personalized risk prediction. Most of the available evidence is prognostic rather than diagnostic: early LUS scores predict BPD subsequently defined at 36 weeks’ postmenstrual age, whereas LUS has not been validated as a diagnostic test for established BPD, and reported cutoffs remain study- and protocol-specific rather than universally applicable. Randomized evidence is confined to LUS-guided surfactant administration, where the demonstrated benefits concern the timing of treatment and the need for invasive ventilation; no trial has yet shown that LUS-guided management reduces the incidence of BPD. Current evidence supports LUS as a complementary imaging modality that extends beyond the assessment of acute neonatal respiratory disease and enables longitudinal bedside monitoring of peripheral lung aeration. Although further multicenter prospective studies are required to harmonize protocols and validate LUS-guided management strategies, the integration of standardized LUS assessment with emerging artificial intelligence technologies has the potential to establish LUS as a key component of precision respiratory care for infants at risk of BPD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Children
Published
2026-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/children13081103
Primary Topic
Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lung Ultrasound in Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: Diagnostic Tool, Prognostic Marker or Monitoring Strategy?

Sabrina Di Pillo, Dorina Hoxha, Marina Attanasi, Paola Di Filippo et al.
Children
Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
article

Lung Ultrasound in Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: Diagnostic Tool, Prognostic Marker or Monitoring Strategy?

Sabrina Di Pillo, Dorina Hoxha, Marina Attanasi, Paola Di Filippo, Chiara Rosolia Capasso, Ilaria Bucci, Francesco Chiarelli
article en

Abstract

Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) remains one of the leading chronic respiratory complications of extreme prematurity despite major advances in neonatal intensive care. Current diagnostic definitions are primarily based on respiratory support requirements and provide limited information on the biological heterogeneity and longitudinal evolution of lung injury. Lung ultrasound (LUS) is progressively reshaping the clinical approach to BPD by enabling radiation-free, bedside, and repeatable assessment of peripheral lung abnormalities throughout the neonatal course. This narrative review examines the current role of LUS in BPD, integrating its pathophysiological basis with the available evidence and distinguishing explicitly between its diagnostic, prognostic, monitoring, and treatment-guiding applications, which are supported by markedly different levels of evidence. We discuss how LUS findings reflect the major components of BPD pathophysiology, compare LUS with conventional imaging modalities, and summarize the scanning protocols, semiquantitative scoring systems, examination schedules, and patient populations that have been evaluated to date. We also review the emerging contribution of artificial intelligence to automated image analysis, standardized image acquisition, and personalized risk prediction. Most of the available evidence is prognostic rather than diagnostic: early LUS scores predict BPD subsequently defined at 36 weeks’ postmenstrual age, whereas LUS has not been validated as a diagnostic test for established BPD, and reported cutoffs remain study- and protocol-specific rather than universally applicable. Randomized evidence is confined to LUS-guided surfactant administration, where the demonstrated benefits concern the timing of treatment and the need for invasive ventilation; no trial has yet shown that LUS-guided management reduces the incidence of BPD. Current evidence supports LUS as a complementary imaging modality that extends beyond the assessment of acute neonatal respiratory disease and enables longitudinal bedside monitoring of peripheral lung aeration. Although further multicenter prospective studies are required to harmonize protocols and validate LUS-guided management strategies, the integration of standardized LUS assessment with emerging artificial intelligence technologies has the potential to establish LUS as a key component of precision respiratory care for infants at risk of BPD.

ChildrenVol. 13(8)
University of Chieti-Pescara (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.