Creep Failure and Pyrolysis Damage Mechanism of <scp>CFRP</scp> Under Thermo‐Mechanical Coupling

ABSTRACT A key challenge in airworthiness of composite aircraft is understanding the thermo‐mechanical response and failure of carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) in in‐flight fire. A sequentially coupled thermal‐stress analysis with a three‐dimensional thermal response model incorporating anisotropic thermal conduction, matrix pyrolysis, and gas diffusion via user subroutines UMATHT and USDFLD was developed. Experiments were conducted under heat fluxes of 35 and 50 kW/m 2 and tensile loads of 20%~80% ultimate strength. It was investigated that the pyrolysis, creep, and failure of CFRP under one‐sided heat flux and tensile loading. Results show the temperature, creep displacement, and failure time of CFRP from simulations agree well with experiments. Significant temperature and pyrolysis gradients occur through the thickness, with the pyrolysis front advancing from the heated zone. Higher heat flux accelerates pyrolysis and expands the pyrolyzed range. Creep rate increases substantially with load and heat flux: at 35 kW/m 2 , the steady‐state creep rate at 80% load is over seven times that at 20% load; at 50 kW/m 2 , this factor is nearly seven. Three distinct failure modes were identified: high stress‐short time failure dominated by fiber fracture, intermediate stress‐long time failure governed by coupled mechanical and thermal damage, and low‐stress failure associated with complete resin pyrolysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Polymer Composites
Published
2026-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.71497
Primary Topic
Flame retardant materials and properties
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Creep Failure and Pyrolysis Damage Mechanism of CFRP Under Thermo‐Mechanical Coupling

Zhenyu Feng, Chi Zhou, Han Li, Jiawei Li et al.
Polymer Composites
Flame retardant materials and properties
article

Creep Failure and Pyrolysis Damage Mechanism of CFRP Under Thermo‐Mechanical Coupling

Zhenyu Feng, Chi Zhou, Han Li, Jiawei Li, Jiang Xie
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT A key challenge in airworthiness of composite aircraft is understanding the thermo‐mechanical response and failure of carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) in in‐flight fire. A sequentially coupled thermal‐stress analysis with a three‐dimensional thermal response model incorporating anisotropic thermal conduction, matrix pyrolysis, and gas diffusion via user subroutines UMATHT and USDFLD was developed. Experiments were conducted under heat fluxes of 35 and 50 kW/m 2 and tensile loads of 20%~80% ultimate strength. It was investigated that the pyrolysis, creep, and failure of CFRP under one‐sided heat flux and tensile loading. Results show the temperature, creep displacement, and failure time of CFRP from simulations agree well with experiments. Significant temperature and pyrolysis gradients occur through the thickness, with the pyrolysis front advancing from the heated zone. Higher heat flux accelerates pyrolysis and expands the pyrolyzed range. Creep rate increases substantially with load and heat flux: at 35 kW/m 2 , the steady‐state creep rate at 80% load is over seven times that at 20% load; at 50 kW/m 2 , this factor is nearly seven. Three distinct failure modes were identified: high stress‐short time failure dominated by fiber fracture, intermediate stress‐long time failure governed by coupled mechanical and thermal damage, and low‐stress failure associated with complete resin pyrolysis.

Polymer Composites
Civil Aviation University of China (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Flame retardant materials and properties
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.