Lost in translation: understanding of jargon used in clinic-patient correspondence

OBJECTIVE: To establish the level of older adults' understanding of medical jargon used in letters sent to patients from audiology departments after an audiology assessment appointment. DESIGN: Participants were asked to define commonly used audiology jargon terms via an online survey platform. The jargon terms were extracted from letters sent from UK National Health Service (NHS) audiology clinics following hearing assessment appointments. STUDY SAMPLE: A total of 175 participants over the age of 50 years (mean age 70 years). RESULTS: 3) were correctly defined by more than 75% of participants. This was independent of age and whether an individual had had a prior audiology appointment and was largely independent of education level. CONCLUSION: Understanding of jargon in NHS audiology department letters amongst older adults is poor, and therefore the use of these phrases should be avoided, or their meaning clearly explained within the letter.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Audiology
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2026.2720842
Primary Topic
Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lost in translation: understanding of jargon used in clinic-patient correspondence

Helen Whiston, Gemma Perfect, Gabrielle Saunders, Mark Sladen et al.
International Journal of Audiology
Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
article

Lost in translation: understanding of jargon used in clinic-patient correspondence

Helen Whiston, Gemma Perfect, Gabrielle Saunders, Mark Sladen, Jenny Chan, Lucinda Pennington, Amber; id_orcid 0009-0003-7486-0580 Roughley
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To establish the level of older adults' understanding of medical jargon used in letters sent to patients from audiology departments after an audiology assessment appointment. DESIGN: Participants were asked to define commonly used audiology jargon terms via an online survey platform. The jargon terms were extracted from letters sent from UK National Health Service (NHS) audiology clinics following hearing assessment appointments. STUDY SAMPLE: A total of 175 participants over the age of 50 years (mean age 70 years). RESULTS: 3) were correctly defined by more than 75% of participants. This was independent of age and whether an individual had had a prior audiology appointment and was largely independent of education level. CONCLUSION: Understanding of jargon in NHS audiology department letters amongst older adults is poor, and therefore the use of these phrases should be avoided, or their meaning clearly explained within the letter.

International Journal of Audiology
University of Manchester (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Lost in translation: understanding of jargon used in clinic-patient correspondence — Helen Whiston, Gemma Perfect, et al. · International Journal of Audiology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS