Not all crickets are equal: selective shrike predation highlights the conservation value of diverse arthropod communities to grassland birds

Understanding dietary preferences and prey selection is pivotal for interpreting the ecology and conservation needs of threatened species. We investigated the diet composition and prey selection of the Red‐backed Shrike Lanius collurio in a montane grassland of the central Italian Apennines, with special regard to sex‐related differences and the relationships between prey use and local prey availability. Using a non‐invasive camera‐trapping protocol at artificial perches, we collected high‐resolution photographic records of predation events over three breeding seasons (2021–2023). This method allowed us to identify individual shrikes through colour‐ringing and enabled prey items to be identified to fine taxonomic resolution. From 2968 recorded predation events involving 18 individually identifiable shrikes, we identified prey belonging to 12 arthropod orders, 52 families, 55 genera and 48 species. Arthropods dominated the diet, with Orthoptera accounting for the majority of prey items, followed by Hymenoptera, Coleoptera, Araneae and Lepidoptera. Multivariate analyses revealed a significant effect of sex on prey composition, whereas perch location had no detectable influence. Males disproportionately consumed large Ensiferans, bumblebees and spiders, whereas females more frequently preyed upon smaller orthopterans and solitary bees. Comparisons between prey use and availability showed clear evidence of active prey selection patterns. Shrikes consistently selected Ensiferan orthopterans and melolonthid beetles over their local availability, whereas abundant taxa such as honeybees and pierid butterflies were avoided. These patterns indicate that prey profitability, handling efficiency and risk probably play a major role in shaping foraging decisions, rather than simple opportunistic feeding. Our results highlighted the importance of diverse arthropod assemblages, particularly Ensiferan communities, in sustaining breeding populations of this declining farmland bird. Methodologically, the study confirmed the effectiveness of camera trapping at fixed perches for obtaining individual‐level dietary data in small passerines. Maintaining structurally heterogeneous grasslands and traditional low‐intensity management practices is critical for preserving key trophic resources and supporting viable Red‐backed Shrike populations in upland landscapes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ibis
Published
2026-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.70113
Primary Topic
Avian ecology and behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Not all crickets are equal: selective shrike predation highlights the conservation value of diverse arthropod communities to grassland birds

Emiliano Mori, Matteo Annessi, Jacopo Martino, Leonardo Ancillotto et al.
Ibis
Avian ecology and behavior
article

Not all crickets are equal: selective shrike predation highlights the conservation value of diverse arthropod communities to grassland birds

Emiliano Mori, Matteo Annessi, Jacopo Martino, Leonardo Ancillotto, Matteo Bianchi, Marco Zaccaroni, Giulia Santalmasi, Tommaso Lipparelli, Sauro Giannerini
article en

Abstract

Understanding dietary preferences and prey selection is pivotal for interpreting the ecology and conservation needs of threatened species. We investigated the diet composition and prey selection of the Red‐backed Shrike Lanius collurio in a montane grassland of the central Italian Apennines, with special regard to sex‐related differences and the relationships between prey use and local prey availability. Using a non‐invasive camera‐trapping protocol at artificial perches, we collected high‐resolution photographic records of predation events over three breeding seasons (2021–2023). This method allowed us to identify individual shrikes through colour‐ringing and enabled prey items to be identified to fine taxonomic resolution. From 2968 recorded predation events involving 18 individually identifiable shrikes, we identified prey belonging to 12 arthropod orders, 52 families, 55 genera and 48 species. Arthropods dominated the diet, with Orthoptera accounting for the majority of prey items, followed by Hymenoptera, Coleoptera, Araneae and Lepidoptera. Multivariate analyses revealed a significant effect of sex on prey composition, whereas perch location had no detectable influence. Males disproportionately consumed large Ensiferans, bumblebees and spiders, whereas females more frequently preyed upon smaller orthopterans and solitary bees. Comparisons between prey use and availability showed clear evidence of active prey selection patterns. Shrikes consistently selected Ensiferan orthopterans and melolonthid beetles over their local availability, whereas abundant taxa such as honeybees and pierid butterflies were avoided. These patterns indicate that prey profitability, handling efficiency and risk probably play a major role in shaping foraging decisions, rather than simple opportunistic feeding. Our results highlighted the importance of diverse arthropod assemblages, particularly Ensiferan communities, in sustaining breeding populations of this declining farmland bird. Methodologically, the study confirmed the effectiveness of camera trapping at fixed perches for obtaining individual‐level dietary data in small passerines. Maintaining structurally heterogeneous grasslands and traditional low‐intensity management practices is critical for preserving key trophic resources and supporting viable Red‐backed Shrike populations in upland landscapes.

Ibis
Roma Tre University (IT), Azienda Sanitaria Locale Viterbo (IT), Istituto per la Valorizzazione del Legno e delle Specie Arboree (IT), University of Florence (IT), Sapienza University of Rome (IT), University of Palermo (IT), University of Bologna (IT)
European Commission
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Avian ecology and behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.