Reliability of a Progressive Learning Autonomy Assessment in a Periodontology Residency Program

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of a surgical progressive learning autonomy assessment tool implemented in a postgraduate periodontology residency program. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted during the Spring and Summer 2025 semesters using a structured, real-time surgical assessment tool. Faculty assessed resident performance after each surgical procedure across domains of autonomy, performance, and case complexity on a five-point scale, while residents completed parallel self-assessments for the same procedures. Inter-rater reliability among faculty and agreement between faculty and residents were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Mixed-model ANOVA was used to compare effects of resident year, procedure type, and rater group (faculty or resident) on mean scores. RESULTS: A total of 561 surgical assessments were analyzed. Faculty inter-rater reliability ranged from low to moderate, with the highest agreement observed for implant placement procedures (ICC = 0.58) and lower agreement for crown lengthening (ICC = 0.13) and extraction with ridge preservation (ICC = 0.09). Agreement between faculty and residents was stronger than inter-faculty agreement for most procedures (ICC > 0.3 for crown lengthening, guided bone regeneration, impant placement osseous). Faculty scores were consistently higher than resident self-scores (p < 0.05 for several procedure-question combinations by 0.3-0.5 points). Residents demonstrated significant progression in scores from Years 1 to 3 for selected procedures, particularly crown lengthening, soft tissue grafting, and extraction-related surgeries. Graduating residents demonstrated competency based on both faculty and self-assessment benchmarks. CONCLUSIONS: A progressive learning autonomy assessment provides reliable, meaningful data on resident development, and highlights differences between perceived and observed competence. This model supports real-time feedback, resident growth, and faculty calibration, with implications for broader adoption in dental specialty education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Dental Education
Published
2026-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.70344
Primary Topic
Innovations in Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reliability of a Progressive Learning Autonomy Assessment in a Periodontology Residency Program

Vanchit John, Monica Gibson, Hawra AlQallaf, Ashwaq Khan et al.
Journal of Dental Education
Innovations in Medical Education
article

Reliability of a Progressive Learning Autonomy Assessment in a Periodontology Residency Program

Vanchit John, Monica Gibson, Hawra AlQallaf, Ashwaq Khan, Ashwin Shastri, GeorgeJ. Eckert, Craig Edberhardt
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of a surgical progressive learning autonomy assessment tool implemented in a postgraduate periodontology residency program. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted during the Spring and Summer 2025 semesters using a structured, real-time surgical assessment tool. Faculty assessed resident performance after each surgical procedure across domains of autonomy, performance, and case complexity on a five-point scale, while residents completed parallel self-assessments for the same procedures. Inter-rater reliability among faculty and agreement between faculty and residents were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Mixed-model ANOVA was used to compare effects of resident year, procedure type, and rater group (faculty or resident) on mean scores. RESULTS: A total of 561 surgical assessments were analyzed. Faculty inter-rater reliability ranged from low to moderate, with the highest agreement observed for implant placement procedures (ICC = 0.58) and lower agreement for crown lengthening (ICC = 0.13) and extraction with ridge preservation (ICC = 0.09). Agreement between faculty and residents was stronger than inter-faculty agreement for most procedures (ICC > 0.3 for crown lengthening, guided bone regeneration, impant placement osseous). Faculty scores were consistently higher than resident self-scores (p < 0.05 for several procedure-question combinations by 0.3-0.5 points). Residents demonstrated significant progression in scores from Years 1 to 3 for selected procedures, particularly crown lengthening, soft tissue grafting, and extraction-related surgeries. Graduating residents demonstrated competency based on both faculty and self-assessment benchmarks. CONCLUSIONS: A progressive learning autonomy assessment provides reliable, meaningful data on resident development, and highlights differences between perceived and observed competence. This model supports real-time feedback, resident growth, and faculty calibration, with implications for broader adoption in dental specialty education.

Journal of Dental Education
Indiana University Health (US), Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Innovations in Medical Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.