Protecting the past, building the future: Istanbul’s heritage strategies considering Vision 2050 and Law no. 5225

Abstract This article critically examines the role of cultural heritage in Istanbul’s contemporary planning framework by analysing the interaction between Law No. 5225 on the Promotion of Cultural Investments and Initiatives (2004) and Istanbul’s Vision 2050 strategy through a document-based and case-informed policy analysis. As a historic metropolis shaped by recurrent shocks such as earthquakes, fires and epidemics, Istanbul provides a compelling context for exploring transformative resilience, path dependency, and multi-scalar governance in cultural heritage management. The study first outlines the significance and vulnerabilities of Istanbul’s World Heritage Sites but shifts beyond descriptive accounts to evaluate how current governance models mediate tensions between economic pragmatism and social-ecological objectives. Findings reveal that while Law 5225 offers instrumental financial incentives for restoration and adaptive reuse, Vision 2050 provides a normative framework aligned with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 11.4 that prioritises public value, social justice and ecological sustainability. However, the lack of binding integration mechanisms between these policy logics creates risks of implementation gaps, commodification, and gentrification-driven displacement. The article argues that Istanbul’s ability to transition from reactive to ‘bounce forward’ resilience depends on establishing governance arrangements that condition economic incentives on measurable social and cultural outcomes. By synthesising policy frameworks and examining micro case dynamics, the article contributes to scholarly debates on urban heritage governance and proposes avenues for building an adaptive and socially equitable model for the city’s future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Built Heritage
Published
2026-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43238-026-00283-7
Primary Topic
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Protecting the past, building the future: Istanbul’s heritage strategies considering Vision 2050 and Law no. 5225

David Simón, Can Emre Memiş
Built Heritage
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
article

Protecting the past, building the future: Istanbul’s heritage strategies considering Vision 2050 and Law no. 5225

David Simón, Can Emre Memiş
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article critically examines the role of cultural heritage in Istanbul’s contemporary planning framework by analysing the interaction between Law No. 5225 on the Promotion of Cultural Investments and Initiatives (2004) and Istanbul’s Vision 2050 strategy through a document-based and case-informed policy analysis. As a historic metropolis shaped by recurrent shocks such as earthquakes, fires and epidemics, Istanbul provides a compelling context for exploring transformative resilience, path dependency, and multi-scalar governance in cultural heritage management. The study first outlines the significance and vulnerabilities of Istanbul’s World Heritage Sites but shifts beyond descriptive accounts to evaluate how current governance models mediate tensions between economic pragmatism and social-ecological objectives. Findings reveal that while Law 5225 offers instrumental financial incentives for restoration and adaptive reuse, Vision 2050 provides a normative framework aligned with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 11.4 that prioritises public value, social justice and ecological sustainability. However, the lack of binding integration mechanisms between these policy logics creates risks of implementation gaps, commodification, and gentrification-driven displacement. The article argues that Istanbul’s ability to transition from reactive to ‘bounce forward’ resilience depends on establishing governance arrangements that condition economic incentives on measurable social and cultural outcomes. By synthesising policy frameworks and examining micro case dynamics, the article contributes to scholarly debates on urban heritage governance and proposes avenues for building an adaptive and socially equitable model for the city’s future.

Built HeritageVol. 10(1)
Royal Holloway University of London (GB), Hacettepe University (TR)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.