Modeling the Potential of a Roadside Two-Stage Ditch to Reduce Flooding and Erosion Risks

Recent efforts to address flooding have explored incorporating flow-reduction capabilities into existing infrastructure. Roadside ditches have historically been viewed as an underutilized component of flood reduction, and a two-stage design has been proposed that modifies a conventional trapezoidal ditch by incorporating bench insets along the main channel. While it is expected that this second stage becomes inundated during storm events, resulting in flow attenuation, the exact impacts of this design are unknown. This study quantified the impact of the two-stage design by modeling a roadside ditch corridor in eastern Iowa. An existing single-stage ditch was converted to a two-stage design, and a HEC-RAS model was constructed to investigate the ditch’s impacts for four design storms (1-year, 2-year, 5-year, and 10-year). In the modeled results, peak flow rates were reduced by 22%, 21%, 7.5%, and 4.3%, respectively, while water volume reductions were near 6%. Maximum velocities throughout the ditch corridor also decreased, with reductions spanning 32% (1-year)–45% (10-year). These results indicate that increased travel times and infiltration associated with the two-stage design provide hydrologic and hydraulic benefits by lessening flood and erosion risk. While further study is needed to verify this behavior through monitoring and modeling at other locations, our findings suggest that two-stage ditches can be a useful best management practice for the transportation community.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hydrology
Published
2026-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology13080220
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modeling the Potential of a Roadside Two-Stage Ditch to Reduce Flooding and Erosion Risks

Betret S. Eustace, Ingrid Cintura, Elliot Anderson, Keith E. Schilling et al.
Hydrology
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
article

Modeling the Potential of a Roadside Two-Stage Ditch to Reduce Flooding and Erosion Risks

Betret S. Eustace, Ingrid Cintura, Elliot Anderson, Keith E. Schilling, Antonio Arenas Amado
article en

Abstract

Recent efforts to address flooding have explored incorporating flow-reduction capabilities into existing infrastructure. Roadside ditches have historically been viewed as an underutilized component of flood reduction, and a two-stage design has been proposed that modifies a conventional trapezoidal ditch by incorporating bench insets along the main channel. While it is expected that this second stage becomes inundated during storm events, resulting in flow attenuation, the exact impacts of this design are unknown. This study quantified the impact of the two-stage design by modeling a roadside ditch corridor in eastern Iowa. An existing single-stage ditch was converted to a two-stage design, and a HEC-RAS model was constructed to investigate the ditch’s impacts for four design storms (1-year, 2-year, 5-year, and 10-year). In the modeled results, peak flow rates were reduced by 22%, 21%, 7.5%, and 4.3%, respectively, while water volume reductions were near 6%. Maximum velocities throughout the ditch corridor also decreased, with reductions spanning 32% (1-year)–45% (10-year). These results indicate that increased travel times and infiltration associated with the two-stage design provide hydrologic and hydraulic benefits by lessening flood and erosion risk. While further study is needed to verify this behavior through monitoring and modeling at other locations, our findings suggest that two-stage ditches can be a useful best management practice for the transportation community.

HydrologyVol. 13(8)
University of Iowa (US), United States Geological Survey (US), Iowa State University (US)
Iowa Department of Transportation
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.