Analytical approaches to account for muscle size when evaluating strength

Skeletal muscle strength is multifactorial. Although associated, skeletal muscle size and strength often change disproportionately following resistance training with different loading paradigms. Examining strength relative to muscle size has been used to evaluate the potential contribution of muscle growth or other factors (e.g., neural or intramuscular adaptations) that occur with strength changes. Moreover, as muscle size could explain differing strength between individuals, comparisons of strength per unit of muscle size are sometimes used to account for differences in strength related to size. Several analytical approaches can be used to account for or hold muscle size fixed when evaluating strength. Based on prior work in sports medicine and other fields, we explored the use of ratio normalization and multiple regression techniques. Data from NHANES (1999-2002) and a previous investigation from our group were used in analysis demonstrations. In synthesizing and applying recommendations from previous work, we highlight some nuances and complexities with ratio normalization that may not be readily apparent without testing assumptions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
2026-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-026-06376-6
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analytical approaches to account for muscle size when evaluating strength

Matthew B. Jessee, Matthew A. Chatlaong, JP Loenneke, J. Bentley et al.
European Journal of Applied Physiology
Sports Performance and Training
article

Analytical approaches to account for muscle size when evaluating strength

Matthew B. Jessee, Matthew A. Chatlaong, JP Loenneke, J. Bentley, Scott J. Dankel, Kealey J. Wohlgemuth
article en

Abstract

Skeletal muscle strength is multifactorial. Although associated, skeletal muscle size and strength often change disproportionately following resistance training with different loading paradigms. Examining strength relative to muscle size has been used to evaluate the potential contribution of muscle growth or other factors (e.g., neural or intramuscular adaptations) that occur with strength changes. Moreover, as muscle size could explain differing strength between individuals, comparisons of strength per unit of muscle size are sometimes used to account for differences in strength related to size. Several analytical approaches can be used to account for or hold muscle size fixed when evaluating strength. Based on prior work in sports medicine and other fields, we explored the use of ratio normalization and multiple regression techniques. Data from NHANES (1999-2002) and a previous investigation from our group were used in analysis demonstrations. In synthesizing and applying recommendations from previous work, we highlight some nuances and complexities with ratio normalization that may not be readily apparent without testing assumptions.

European Journal of Applied Physiology
University of Mississippi (US), Rowan University (US), University of Cincinnati (US), University of Cincinnati Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.